10
$\begingroup$

I'm facing a strange behavior of HoldForm.

I need to display 1/2*3/4 in LaTeX like this : $$ \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{3}{4} $$

So I use Mathematica : 1/2* 3/4 // HoldForm // TeXForm BUT I get $$ \frac{3}{2\ 4} $$

First the writing 2 space 4 is ambigous and second it does not hold form at all :(

Can you help me ? Thank you ! (happy Holidays)

EDIT : I would need an automatic transformation of any input to correct TeX or an automatic correction of any output to correct TeX.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: Multiplication sign in TeXForm? $\endgroup$
    – Karsten7
    Commented Dec 25, 2014 at 17:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Another way: HoldForm[Divide[1, 2] Divide[3, 4]] // TeXForm $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 25, 2014 at 19:53

4 Answers 4

10
$\begingroup$

Use HoldForm applied to each fraction to keep the fractions from combining.

HoldForm[1/2] HoldForm[3/4]

to produce $$ \frac{1}{2} \frac{3}{4} $$

or

HoldForm[(1/2) (3/4)]

to produce $$ \frac{3}{2 \times 4} $$

Using TeXForm produces the desired LaTex code.

(HoldForm[1/2] HoldForm[3/4]) // TeXForm
(* \frac{1}{2} \frac{3}{4} *)

Addendum

Simpler is

Infix[f[1/2, 3/4], "\[Times]"] // TeXForm
(* \frac{1}{2}\times \frac{3}{4} *)

which also provides the times sign. $$\frac{1}{2}\times \frac{3}{4}$$

Second Addendum

z1 z2 /. Times -> Cross /. {z1 -> 1/2, z2 -> 3/4} // TeXForm

also produces the desired output. (This is based on the third Answer to 39061.)

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ How can I automatically apply this to my input 1/2*3/4 ? $\endgroup$
    – Crypto
    Commented Dec 26, 2014 at 13:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Crypto, that depends on the form of your input. If you literally want to change 1/2*3/4 to the form in my last equation, doing so is easy. However, I would guess that you want to do something more complicated. Please give an actual example, if possible, if your input. $\endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    Commented Dec 26, 2014 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ I mean, I am looking for a way to get the more accurate TeX translation of my input. I can make any transformation before or after, apply any Mathematica function or any post processing. Currently, I get the TeX Output and add a \times where there is a space. So the current output is $$\frac{3}{2 \times 4} $$ I would like any other transformation to be more accurate. How to convert HoldForm[1/2*3/4] to HoldForm[1/2] HoldForm[3/4] in an aotomated way for example. $\endgroup$
    – Crypto
    Commented Dec 26, 2014 at 14:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Crypto, please provide example, so I know what you have in mind. For instance, is it just the product of two fractions? $\endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    Commented Dec 26, 2014 at 14:11
  • $\begingroup$ I have seen this kind of behaviour only with fractions (but maybe there are others). So first, I would need a trick to bypass this fraction behaviour automatically. (Maybe there is nothing simple) $\endgroup$
    – Crypto
    Commented Dec 26, 2014 at 14:21
4
$\begingroup$

The behavior you observe is due to the formatting rules associated with Times. Please start by reading my answer here: Returning an unevaluated expression with values substituted in. We can apply a similar technique here though the result is not quite as desired if we merely block Times during Box creation. We get:

$\left(1*\frac{1}{2}\right)*\left(3*\frac{1}{4}\right)$

This form is due to the internal format of 1/2 and 3/4:

Hold[1/2, 3/4] // FullForm
Hold[Times[1, Power[2, -1]], Times[3, Power[4, -1]]]

One way to handle this is to post-process the Box form yield the format we desire:

SetAttributes[hf, HoldAll]

MakeBoxes[hf[args__], fmt_] := 
 Block[{Times}, MakeBoxes[HoldForm[args], fmt]] /. 
  RowBox[{"(", RowBox[{n_, "*", FractionBox["1", d_]}], ")"}] :> FractionBox[n, d]

Now using hf in place of HoldForm:

hf[1/2*3/4] // TeXForm
\frac{1}{2}*\frac{3}{4}

Formatted:

$\frac{1}{2}*\frac{3}{4}$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Rather very complicated oO, but it could be an option ! I need an automated method to deal with MM input or TeX output in order to convert it into correct TeX. $\endgroup$
    – Crypto
    Commented Dec 26, 2014 at 13:49
  • $\begingroup$ @Crypto does using hf in place of HoldForm not work for you? If it fails please give me an example so that I can try to improve either my code or my recommendation. $\endgroup$
    – Mr.Wizard
    Commented Dec 26, 2014 at 22:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your function seems to correct one type problem with fraction. But I am more looking for something able to display TeX in the exact form I write them. Probably MM is not the right tool to use. I am disapointed. $\endgroup$
    – Crypto
    Commented Dec 28, 2014 at 19:09
  • $\begingroup$ @Crypto please see the second answer I just added. If again this doesn't work for you please give an example where it fails. $\endgroup$
    – Mr.Wizard
    Commented Dec 28, 2014 at 23:29
3
$\begingroup$

I am posting a second answer because I am now taking a very different interpretation of your problem. In a comment below my first answer you state:

Your function seems to correct one type problem with fraction. But I am more looking for something able to display TeX in the exact form I write them. Probably MM is not the right tool to use. I am disapointed.

I assumed that you were looking for TeX conversion of arbitrary expressions generated by (evaluation in) Mathematica but if instead you simply want TeX for expressions in "the exact form I write them" you may be able to use Strings, e.g.:

enter image description here

The string was created using standard input methods. \[Times] was entered with Esc*Esc.

Here is the input in copyable form:

"\!\(\*FractionBox[\(1\), \(2\)]\)\[Times]\!\(\*FractionBox[\(3\), \(4\)]\)" // TeXForm

And the output formatted by MathJax:

$\frac{1}{2}\times \frac{3}{4}$

Critically this method avoids interpretation of your raw input into e.g. Times and Power, thereby bypassing those "pretty printing" rules that were changing your expression in an unwanted way.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank You for this second method. $\endgroup$
    – Crypto
    Commented Jan 2, 2015 at 14:56
2
$\begingroup$

This unexpected behaviour of HoldForm and Hold seems to be due to the function MakeExpression and not a bug in HoldForm or Hold.

Having entered

Hold[1/2 3/4]

the frontend sends the command

MakeExpression[BoxData[RowBox[{"Hold","[",RowBox[{RowBox[{"1","/","2"}],
  RowBox[{"3","/","4"}]}],"]"}]],StandardForm]

to the kernel for further evaluation. The essential part is

MakeExpression[BoxData[RowBox[{RowBox[{"a","/","b"}],
  RowBox[{"c","/","d"}]}]],StandardForm]

(* HoldComplete[(a c)/(b d)] *)

So already in MakeExpression the numerators and denominaters are collected to one numerator and denominator, before Hold or HoldForm is used.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.