1
$\begingroup$

I am confused about incomplete gamma function calculation in Mathematica and MATLAB:

For example, in Mathematica: Gamma[5,3] = 19.56

But in MATLAB: gammainc(5,3) = 0.8753

I don't know which one is correct, MATLAB result or Mathematica result?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Also, this relationship is valid: gammainc(a,b,'upper')*gamma(b) in Matlab gives the same result as Gamma[b,a] in Mathematica. $\endgroup$ Jan 11, 2022 at 23:37

1 Answer 1

15
$\begingroup$

In Mathematica, Gamma[a, z] refers to the upper incomplete Gamma function, given by

$$\Gamma(a,z)=\int_z^\infty t^{a-1}e^{-t}\,dt$$

whereas in MATLAB, gammainc(z, a) refers to the regularized lower incomplete Gamma function

$$P(a,z)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(a)}\int_0^z t^{a-1}e^{-t}\, dt$$

Obviously, they give different results. To get MATLAB's result in Mathematica, use the following:

gammainc[a_, z_] := Gamma[a, 0, z]/Gamma[a]
N@gammainc[3, 5]

(* 0.875348 *)
$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In fact, you could simplify things slightly: gammainc[a_, z_] := GammaRegularized[a, 0, z]; it has been anticipated that people would frequently want the scaled version. $\endgroup$ May 10, 2015 at 10:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.