Function definition
F[x1_, x2_, c1_, c2_, R_] := Which[ R >= 0 && (c1 - x1)^2 + (c2 - x2)^2 <= R^2, 1, True, 0]
Plot3D[F[x1, x2, 1, 1/2, 1], {x1, -1, 3}, {x2, -1, 2} ]
first addendum
Mathematica v12.2 evaluates wrong result for the Fouriertransform
FourierTransform[UnitStep[R^2 - ( (x1 - c1)^2 + (x2 - c2)^2 )] , {x1, x2}, {\[Omega]1, \[Omega]2},
Assumptions -> {Element[{R, c1, c2}, Reals], R > 0}]
(* 0 *)
Numerical evaluation of a special gives (takes some time...)
With[{c1 = 1/2, c2 = 1/4, R = 1},
reg = ImplicitRegion[(x1 - c1)^2 + (x2 - c2)^2 <= R^2, {x1, x2}];
ft[\[Omega]1_?NumericQ, \[Omega]2_?NumericQ] :=
1/(2 Pi) NIntegrate[
UnitStep[R^2 - ( (x1 - c1)^2 + (x2 - c2)^2 )] Exp[
I (x1 \[Omega]1 + x2 \[Omega]2 )], Element[{x1, x2}, reg] ];
{Plot3D[Re@ft[om1, om2], {om1, -10, 10}, {om2, -10, 10},
PlotRange -> All],
Plot3D[Im@ft[om1, om2], {om1, -10, 10}, {om2, -10, 10},
PlotRange -> All]}]
second addendum
Introducing polarcoordinates x1->c1+r Cos[phi],x2->c1+r Sin[phi]
it is possible to evaluate the FourierTransform analytically
Fouriertransform 1/(2 Pi) \[Integral]Exp[I (x1 \[Omega]1 +x2 \[Omega]2 )] dx1 dx2
transforms to
ft= 1/(2 Pi) Integrate[r Exp[I ( \[Omega]1 (c1 + r Cos[\[CurlyPhi]]) + \[Omega]2 (c2 +r Sin[\[CurlyPhi]]))], {r, 0, R}, {\[CurlyPhi], 0, 2 Pi},
Assumptions ->Element[{r, R, \[Omega]1, \[Omega]2}, Reals]] // Simplify
Result confirms the numerical example
With[{c1 = 1/2, c2 = 1/4,
R = 1}, {Plot3D[
Re@(1/2 E^(I (c1 \[Omega]1 + c2 \[Omega]2))
R^2 Hypergeometric0F1Regularized[
2, -(1/4) R^2 (\[Omega]1^2 + \[Omega]2^2)]), {\[Omega]1, -10,
10}, {\[Omega]2, -10, 10}, PlotRange -> All],
Plot3D[Im@(1/2 E^(I (c1 \[Omega]1 + c2 \[Omega]2))
R^2 Hypergeometric0F1Regularized[
2, -(1/4) R^2 (\[Omega]1^2 + \[Omega]2^2)]), {\[Omega]1, -10,
10}, {\[Omega]2, -10, 10}, PlotRange -> All]}]
Boole@RegionMember[Disk[{c1, c2}, R], {x1, x2}]
$\endgroup$F[x1_,x_2,c_1,c_2,R]
that is $1$ inside the circle (or on the circumference thereof), and $0$ elsewhere. There has to be an explicit dependence on the coordinates $x_1,x_2$, otherwise there would be no way to act on it with the Fourier transform (I think). $\endgroup$