I have the following (and terrible) system of ordinary differential equations up to fourth order (one of the equations is like a restriction for the other) for the one variable real functions $a(t)$ and $b(t)$:
$0=\frac{-12 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 b(t)^2 a''(t)^2-24 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 b(t) a'(t)^2 b''(t)+60 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 a'(t)^2 b'(t)^2-36 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) b(t)^2 a'(t)^4+6 \gamma a(t)^2 b(t)^4 a'(t)^2+24 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a^{(3)}(t) a(t)^2 b(t)^2 a'(t)-24 b'(t) \left(\gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t) b(t) a'(t)^3+2 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 b(t) a'(t) a''(t)\right)+24 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t) b(t)^2 a'(t)^2 a''(t)-\Lambda a(t)^4 b(t)^2}{2 \gamma a(t)^4 b(t)^4}$
$0=-\frac{8 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^3 a^{(4)}(t) b(t)^3+12 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 b(t)^3 a''(t)^2-8 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^3 b^{(3)}(t) b(t)^2 a'(t)-120 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^3 a'(t) b'(t)^3+12 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) b(t)^3 a'(t)^4+2 \gamma a(t)^2 b(t)^5 a'(t)^2+16 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 a^{(3)}(t) b(t)^3 a'(t)+60 b'(t)^2 \left(2 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^3 b(t) a''(t)+\gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 b(t) a'(t)^2\right)-16 b''(t) \left(2 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^3 b(t)^2 a''(t)-5 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^3 b(t) a'(t) b'(t)+\gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 b(t)^2 a'(t)^2\right)+4 a''(t) \left(\gamma a(t)^3 b(t)^5-12 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t) b(t)^3 a'(t)^2\right)-4 b'(t) \left(12 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^3 a^{(3)}(t) b(t)^2-12 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t) b(t)^2 a'(t)^3+\gamma a(t)^3 b(t)^4 a'(t)+18 \gamma (3 \alpha -\beta ) a(t)^2 b(t)^2 a'(t) a''(t)\right)-\Lambda b(t)^7}{2 \gamma a(t)^2 b(t)^7}$
Where I am using prime to denote derivative with respect to time $t$. In Mathematica they look like this
Ec1 = 1/(
2 \[Gamma] a[t]^4 b[t]^4) (6 \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t]^4 a'[t]^2 -
36 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*b[t]^2 a'[t]^4 +
24 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t] b[t]^2 a'[t]^2 a''[t] -
12 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t]^2 a''[t]^2 +
24 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t]^2 a'[t] a'''[t] +
60 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 a'[t]^2 b'[t]^2 -
24 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t] a'[t]^2 b''[t] -
a[t]^4 b[t]^2 \[CapitalLambda] -
24 ((3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t] b[t] a'[t]^3 +
2 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t] a'[t] a''[t]) b'[
t])
Ec2 = -(1/(
2 \[Gamma] a[t]^2 b[t]^7)) (2 \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t]^5 a'[t]^2 +
12 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*b[t]^3 a'[t]^4 +
12 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t]^3 a''[t]^2 +
16 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2*b[t]^3 a'[t]*a'''[t] +
8 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^3*b[t]^3 a''''[t] -
120 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^3 a'[t]*b'[t]^3 -
8 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^3*b[t]^2*a'[t]*b'''[t] +
b[t]^7 (-\[CapitalLambda]) +
60 ((3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2 b[t]*a'[t]^2 +
2 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^3 b[t]*a''[t]) b'[
t]^2 + 4 (\[Gamma]*a[t]^3 b[t]^5 -
12 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]*b[t]^3*a'[t]^2) a''[
t] - 4 (\[Gamma]*a[t]^3 b[t]^4 a'[t] -
12 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]*b[t]^2*a'[t]^3 +
18 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2*
b[t]^2 a'[t] a''[t] +
12 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^3*b[t]^2 a'''[t]) b'[
t] - 16 ((3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^2*b[t]^2*
a'[t]^2 +
2 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^3*b[t]^2*a''[t] -
5 (3 \[Alpha] - \[Beta]) \[Gamma]*a[t]^3*b[t]*a'[t]*b'[t]) b''[
t])
[Alpha] = 1/20; [Beta] = 1/5; [Gamma] = 1; [CapitalLambda] = 1;
sol = NDSolve[{Ec1 == 0,Ec2== 0, ic}, {a[t], b[t]}, {t, 0,1} ]
Here, $\alpha$,$\beta$,$\gamma$ and $\Lambda$ are constants of $O(1)$. Of course, a lot of initial conditions need to be given. Some reasonable initial conditions from the context of the problem are $a(t=1)=b(t=1)=1$, and their first derivatives should be positive $a'(t=1),b'(t=1)>0$ but not so big (0.5, for example). I don't have more information in order to give solid initial conditions for the higher derivatives, but it is reasonable again to choose them positive and the initial condition for the second derivative $b''(t=1)$ can be obtained from the first equation by consistency. One could choose, for example:
ic = {a[1] == 1, a'[1] == 1, a''[1] == 1/2, a'''[1]==1/2 , b[1] == 1,
b'[1] == 1, b''[1] == -(103/24)}
The problem is that Mathematica is cannot solve this system, giving errors like "NDSolve::ndcf: Repeated convergence test failure at t == 1.`; unable to continue.".
I have tried to use AsymptoticDSolveValue too (https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/AsymptoticDSolveValue.html), but it doesn't work. I would like to know if it's possible to know something about the solution of this system, if one can check its singularities, behaviour near $t=0$, etc.
\[CapitalLambda][t]
in one place then write\[CapitalLambda]
on its own with no argument in another place. Besides this, how is NDSolve supposed to solve this if it does not know what this function is? You also have\[Alpha] , \[Beta]
in there with no numerical values. This will not work for numerical solver. $\endgroup$Cannot solve to find an explicit formula for the derivatives. NDSolve will try solving the system as differential-algebraic equations
. May be someone else will have an idea why it says so for your system. $\endgroup$NDSolve
code, and in a comment block, the error message you're getting so all someone has to do is copy and paste and run it. Normally good practice to Latex the DE but yours is so messy it's only a distraction. Consider removing it. $\endgroup$