I understand that when Around is used in computations, uncertainties are by default propagated using a first-order series approximation, assuming no correlations. On the other hand this makes it impossible to propagate uncertainties where one variable appears more than once in the formula, even if all the variables are uncorrelated to each other, because it looks like Mathematica is considering every appearance of the same variable as different variables. Take for instance:
a = Around[7,2];
4a yields 28pm8 (correct result) whereas a+a+a+a yields 28pm4 (wrong). Well, in this case it's obvious how to solve the problem, but if we need for example:
a+Log[a]
Mathematica yields 8.9pm2.0 and I haven't found a way to get the proper result 8.9pm2.3.
a + a + a + afirst evaluates to the sum of fourAround[]expressions,Around[7,2] + Around[7,2] +.... No reference to the fact that they came from the same variable remains.Aroundwould need to keep an ID tag in order to correlate errors, something that is not done, AFAIK. $\endgroup$Arounddocumentation is the exact point you make (sum vs. multiplication): "Two different instances of the same Around object are assumed to be uncorrelated; Therefore, the resulting uncertainty is smaller than that obtained by multiplication by 2". I agree that this leads to complications though.AroundReplaceseems to be the (very clumsy!) answer to this problem. $\endgroup$