I would like to use a local variable within Dynamic
, but that may not work, and the front end will show the local variable in red to give a warning. However, if I define a global variable to equal the local one, then I can use the global one inside Dynamic
. Will this always work, or is it just a way to hide a problem that may occur? For example, this works:
Manipulate[
Block[{data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {2, 2}]}, dataG = data;
Dynamic@ArrayPlot[dataG^p]], {p, 0.1, 10},
SynchronousUpdating -> False]
(In the present example, since the only effect on the plot of changing p
is to change the color, one could also use ColorFunction
.)
I stripped away many details from the application I have in mind. Rather than a simple data
, I have a complicated calculation to do that depends on other control variables of the Manipulate
. And that is the other reason for using Dynamic
and why I want the local variable to be defined within Manipulate
.
If this will not always work, is there a convenient way to introduce global variables so that they do not conflict with other global variables in the same session and without having to remember or check what has been used already?
Manipulate[ArrayPlot[...], ...]
in a scoping construct, egModule
,DynamicModule
, orWith
(but not Block):Module[{data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {2, 2}]}, Manipulate[ArrayPlot[data^p], {p, 0.1, 10}, SynchronousUpdating -> False]]
. You won’t need Dynamic inside this way. $\endgroup$data
, I have a complicated calculation to do that depends on other control variables of theManipulate
. And that is the other reason for usingDynamic
. $\endgroup$With
on the example:Manipulate[With[{data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {4, 4}]}, Dynamic@ArrayPlot[data^p]], {p, 0.1, 10}, SynchronousUpdating -> False]
$\endgroup$With
because I need to to some calculations before I obtain the value ofdata
, and these depend on other control variables. $\endgroup$