13
$\begingroup$

When I try this command

Integrate[1/Sqrt[(s^2 - u)^2 - 1], {s, m, Infinity}, Assumptions -> u > 2 && m > 10]

Mathematica declares that the integral does not converge on {m, ∞}

The integral, though, is clearly convergent, and Mathematica has no trouble evaluating it at any value of $u > 1$. A command such as

Integrate[1/Sqrt[(s^2 - 20.1)^2 - 1], {s, m, Infinity}, Assumptions -> m > 10]

works fine.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Version 12.0 returns the input in several minutes. $\endgroup$
    – user64494
    Mar 3, 2020 at 20:23

3 Answers 3

14
$\begingroup$

To make your integral convergent, you should have assumed m > Sqrt[u + 1]; then, you shouldn't have assumed other conditions for m. If we do that, we get a pretty nice result :

int[u_, m_] = Integrate[ 1/Sqrt[(s^2 - u)^2 - 1], {s, m, Infinity}, 
                                   Assumptions -> u > 2 && m > Sqrt[u + 1]]
 EllipticF[ArcSin[m/Sqrt[-1 + u]], (-1 + u)/(1 + u)]/Sqrt[1 + u] + 
  I (2/Sqrt[-1 + m^2 - u] + EllipticK[2/(1 + u)]/Sqrt[1 + u])
% // TraditionalForm

result

Edit

This result isn't manifestly real while the integral should be. The problem comes from the fact that ArcSin is a well defined function assuming an appropriate convention on certain region. Evaluating numerically the result we get nonvanishing imaginary part because Mathematica assumes an arbitrary ( inadequate in this case) convention. However, we should simply cancel that part. We can see this problem defining a numerical integral :

nint[u_, m_] := NIntegrate[1/Sqrt[(s^2 - u)^2 - 1],
                                  {s, m, Infinity} ] /; u > 2 && m > Sqrt[u + 1]

e.g.

{ int[3, 3] // N, nint[3, 3]}
 {0.38116 + 0.894427 I, 0.38116}
{ int[5, 6] // N, nint[5, 6]}
 {0.175115 + 0.365148 I, 0.175115}

Thus the result itself is correct but the symbolic integral int should be supplemented by an adequate rule, in our case it is simply int[u,m] -> Re @ int[u,m].

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ this explain is nice. $\endgroup$
    – Junho Lee
    Sep 22, 2014 at 11:53
9
$\begingroup$

Artes has already explained how Integrate[] goofs up. My personal opinion is that Integrate[]'s handling of elliptic integrals is rather suboptimal in general, so I'll supply a closed form that you might be interested in:

intTrue[u_, m_] := InverseJacobiCN[(m^2 - Sqrt[u^2 - 1])/(m^2 + Sqrt[u^2 - 1]),
                                   (1 + u/Sqrt[u^2 - 1])/2]/(2 (u^2 - 1)^(1/4))

(I derived this using formula 266.00 in Byrd and Friedman)

Test, with Artes's cases:

N[{intTrue[3, 3], intTrue[5, 6]}, 20] // Chop
   {0.38116007331988842687, 0.17511500066578163200}
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

With the variable substitution

s^2 - u == x

the integration is now

Integrate[(1/(2*Sqrt[u + x]))*(1/Sqrt[-1 + x^2]), {x, m^2 - u, Infinity}, 
Assumptions -> u > 2 && m > Sqrt[u + 1]]

and gives

EllipticF[ArcSin[Sqrt[1 + u]/m], (-1 + u)/(1 + u)]/Sqrt[1 + u]

which is the real part of the above result. (Argument of Arcsin reversed!)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.