Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions on exact, symmetric reversal of a definition or functional mapping (i.e. the original form is returned when applied twice). Use this tag for issues on inversion of Mathematica expressions, or general inversion of math constructs.
0
votes
0
answers
80
views
A case for matrix multiplication (a.b).c unequal to a.(b.c) in mathematica 12.0.0.0, why?
[c]" gives the following warning
Inverse::luc: Result for Inverse of badly conditioned matrix (<<1>>) may contain significant numerical errors. … Then I try to use the matrix
a=Inverse[Inverse[c].c]
as a correction. The new Inverse is "a.b". When I test the new inverse, Mathematica gives the following results
which are obviously different. …