Here is a simple differential equation.

mwe=y[x]/.First@DSolve [{y'[x]==x-2*x*y[x],y[0]==0},y[x],x]

I get the answer $\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e^{-x^2}}{2}$

If I build up the same equation in a simple program, I get a different answer:


After simplifying, I get the answer $\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e^{-2x^2}}{2}$. Where did the extra factor of $2$ in the exponent come from? And how can I make it go away?


You attempt to solve the ODE at the time of definition of lsolve. At this point, q does not depend on x. You really want to use SetDelayed here:

lsolve[r_, q_, a_, eta_] := 
  y[x] /. First@DSolve[{y'[x] == r - q*y[x], y[a] == eta}, y[x], x];
nwe = lsolve[x, 2*x, 0, 0] // Simplify

1/2 - E^-x^2/2

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I'm glad I asked. Even though my version was syntactically correct, it would have been nice if Mathematica produced a warning! $\endgroup$ – Joe Corneli Feb 12 '19 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ How should Mathematica be able to detect that this does not align with your expectations? Both syntaxes f[x_] = ... and f[x_] := ... have the applications, e.g., the former can be considered as a shorthand for f[x_] := Evaluate[...]. This is usefull whenever a symbolic compuation can already performed at the time of definition so that it need not be redone every time f is called. $\endgroup$ – Henrik Schumacher Feb 12 '19 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ As you said in the answer: "At this point, q does not depend on x." I think Mathematica should be able to tell that I was building an expression that does depend on x and then generate a warning (but certainly not an error) very much along the lines of what you told me. Otherwise everyone who doesn't know about := will end up asking a question similar to mine. How to preempt that and automate your answer? :-) $\endgroup$ – Joe Corneli Feb 13 '19 at 13:18
  • $\begingroup$ When an assignment is made with =, Mathematica can only set the left hand side to the value of the right hand side at the time of assignment. Evaluate y[x]/.First@DSolve[{y'[x]==r-q*y[x],y[a]==eta},y[x],x] (just in case: in a fresh kernel) and you will see that the result is (E^(-q x) (E^(a q) eta q - E^(a q) r + E^(q x) r))/q. Because Mathematica solves the ODE at this point in time and because q is independent of x. Of course, you may tell Mathematica that q should depend on x by using q[x] instead of q, but I don't think you will like the result either. $\endgroup$ – Henrik Schumacher Feb 13 '19 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand what you mean by "automation". The difference between = and := lies in the time of execution of the right hand side. If you want that the ODE is solved only after a precise value of q is supplied, you have to use :=. And yes, there are a lot of questions on the subtle differences of = and := on this site. And I have to admit that was also something that was quite miraculous to me when I started to use the language. It helps a bit to recall that Mathematica, in its core, is nothing else but a term rewriting system. $\endgroup$ – Henrik Schumacher Feb 13 '19 at 13:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.