3
$\begingroup$

I am a newbie and I'm trying to use Mathematica to obtain the symbolic Maximum Likelihood Estimation for a cumulative normal distribution. So far I have reached the step where I have the derivative of the log likelihood for both $\mu$ and $\sigma$, i.e. $ \text{score}=\left\{\frac{\partial \text{logL}}{\partial \mu },\frac{\partial \text{logL}}{\partial \sigma }\right\} $, or

$$ \left\{\sum _{i=1}^n -\frac{\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi }} e^{-\frac{\left(\mu -x_i\right){}^2}{2 \sigma ^2}}}{\sigma \text{erfc}\left(\frac{\mu -x_i}{\sqrt{2} \sigma }\right)},\sum _{i=1}^n \frac{\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi }} \left(\mu -x_i\right) e^{-\frac{\left(\mu -x_i\right){}^2}{2 \sigma ^2}}}{\sigma ^2 \text{erfc}\left(\frac{\mu -x_i}{\sqrt{2} \sigma }\right)}\right\} $$ The problem is that when I try to solve when these expressions are 0:

Solve[score == {0, 0} && σ > 0, {μ, σ}]

Mathematica tells me that it can't solve it (Solve::nsmet: This system cannot be solved with the methods available to Solve).

Is this really such a hard problem or am I missing something?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Try Solve[ Thread[ score={0,0}]...] $\endgroup$
    – chris
    Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ and please typeset mathematica expressions. cf the FAQ. $\endgroup$
    – chris
    Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:20
  • $\begingroup$ @chris I tried it with Thread but it still doesn't work, also it works for other distributions such as Poisson, so if Thread is just for the syntax, i don't think I have a syntax issue $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is your 'cumulative normal distribution'? Do you mean a Normal distribution, or the distribution of the sample sum, or something else? $\endgroup$
    – wolfies
    Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Eh? The CDF of the Normal is not the pdf. The MLE is calculated wrt the pdf, not the cdf. $\endgroup$
    – wolfies
    Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:45

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Let us try with a Normal distribution. Start by the log normal of it:

ff = PowerExpand[Log@ PDF[NormalDistribution[μ, σ], x], 
Assumptions -> {σ > 0,μ ∈  Reals,  x ∈ Reals}]

Now the log likelihood obey

Q = Sum[ff /. x -> Subscript[x, i], {i, n}]

Mathematica graphics

We can define the condition of stastionarity

eqn = Thread[D[Q, #] & /@ {σ, μ} == 0]

Mathematica graphics

We need to tell mathematica to expand the sums

eqn2 = 
 eqn /. Sum[a_, b_] :>  sum[Expand[a], b] //. 
     sum[a_ + b_, c_] :> sum[a, c] + sum[b, c] /. 
    sum[a_ b_, c_] :> b   sum[a, c] /; FreeQ[b, Subscript[x, i]] /. 
   sum[a_, b_] :> a sum[1, b] /; FreeQ[a, Subscript[x, i]] /. 
  sum -> Sum

Mathematica graphics

now we can solve

Solve[eqn2, {μ, σ }][[2]]

Mathematica graphics

QED

EDIT

You might want to look at the LogLikelihood function

With this function, taking a definite (n=3) case

Q = LogLikelihood[NormalDistribution[μ, σ], Table[Subscript[x, i], {i, 3}]]

Solve[Thread[D[Q, #] & /@ {μ, σ} == 0], {μ, σ}]

Mathematica graphics

With a numerical example:

data = RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[1, 2], 100];

Q = LogLikelihood[NormalDistribution[μ, σ], data];

sol=NSolve[Thread[D[Q, #] & /@ {μ, σ} == 0], {μ, σ}][[2]]

(* ==> {μ-> 0.92576,  σ-> 2.03064} *)

Show[ContourPlot[Q, {μ, -1, 3}, {σ, 1, 3}, ColorFunction -> "Heat"], 
Graphics[Point[{μ, σ}] /. sol]]

Mathematica graphics

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ For a cumulative distribution? What sort of density would you suggest this cumulative distribution has? $\endgroup$
    – wolfies
    Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:52
  • $\begingroup$ @chris so this means that the only way to fit a dataset with normcdf is numerical optimization? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:54
  • $\begingroup$ @wolfies I guess its a good point: the CDF is not normalized... $\endgroup$
    – chris
    Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 17:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @chris thank you very much for your detailed answer :) $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 28, 2013 at 18:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The problem is that a normal cumulative distribution is not a distribution as its integral diverges. $\endgroup$
    – chris
    Commented Mar 29, 2013 at 6:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.