Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 16, 2015 at 3:25 history edited Mr.Wizard
edited tags
Aug 28, 2014 at 2:24 comment added Mr.Wizard Also see: (4667323)
Aug 28, 2014 at 0:20 comment added Michael E2 Nearly a duplicate of Elegant way of obtaining the envelope of oscillating function, which is a duplicate of Mathematica envelope for the bottom of a plot, a generic function. But this one just straight trigonometry.
Jun 4, 2014 at 14:38 vote accept Unbelievable
Jun 4, 2014 at 3:55 answer added user484 timeline score: 20
Jun 4, 2014 at 3:13 history edited m_goldberg CC BY-SA 3.0
Moderate clean-up
Jun 3, 2014 at 19:27 comment added Mark McClure I edited your question. You should make sure that I preserved your intended meaning.
Jun 3, 2014 at 19:26 history edited Mark McClure CC BY-SA 3.0
added 223 characters in body
Jun 3, 2014 at 19:05 review Close votes
Jun 3, 2014 at 21:31
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:56 comment added Unbelievable Ok. I can understand why for every frequency which are different with the one the frequency of the sheath will be 1/2 and for different equal to 2, sheath frequency will be 1 and so on.
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:56 answer added Mark McClure timeline score: 15
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:45 comment added Unbelievable Yes, it was exactly I want. thank you so much. Now, I must think why for every frequency, we can use of the +-2Cos[t/2].
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:40 comment added Mark McClure In that case, your sheath is given pretty much perfectly by $\pm 2\cos(t/2)$, but maybe that's not what you want?
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:36 comment added Unbelievable I plotted these ones with: Plot[{Cos[50 t] + Cos[51 t], Cos[t] + 1.5, -Cos[t] - 1.5}, {t, 0, 10}], I used of simulated functions 'Cos[t] + 1.5' and '-Cos[t] - 1.5' for the sheath.
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:34 comment added Mark McClure Well, you've got to give us some kind of input to start with.
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:32 comment added Unbelievable this is completely true but this is for the Fig.1, I want to access to sheath while I do not access to any formula for that.
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:29 comment added Mark McClure I'm guessing that's something like Cos[42x]+Cos[43x]?
Jun 3, 2014 at 18:27 history asked Unbelievable CC BY-SA 3.0