Timeline for Extracting frequencies with Fourier transformation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 9, 2017 at 19:43 | history | edited | kglr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Feb 6, 2014 at 11:20 | vote | accept | holistic | ||
Feb 3, 2014 at 11:41 | comment | added | Nasser |
If you say so. I do not know about fMRI. But one sample each 2.8 seconds sounds too slow to me. any way, you can change that later if you find otherwise. change fs below, which is the sample rate of the data.
|
|
Feb 3, 2014 at 11:38 | comment | added | holistic | I'm not really sure, but every 2,8 sec a scan was done, i.e. data was collected..so the sampling rate must be 2,8 sec? | |
Feb 3, 2014 at 11:25 | comment | added | Nasser |
btw, this looks like a very low sample rate. You can adjust the code below if you think it is different. 0.357 samples per second is very low but you can check it on your end. If you meant it was 2800 samples per second, then change fs below to 2800.
|
|
Feb 3, 2014 at 11:17 | answer | added | Nasser | timeline score: 10 | |
Feb 3, 2014 at 11:14 | comment | added | Nasser | Ok, so fs=0.357 hz? (1/2.8) | |
Feb 3, 2014 at 11:07 | comment | added | holistic | @Nasser: It's data from an fMRI scan. So a scan was done every 2800 ms. Sorry, I'm just trying to get more into this stuff :/ | |
Feb 3, 2014 at 10:54 | comment | added | Nasser | What was the sampling frequency? | |
Feb 3, 2014 at 10:40 | history | edited | holistic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 228 characters in body
|
Feb 3, 2014 at 10:25 | history | asked | holistic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |