Skip to main content
added 186 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
HyperGroups
  • 8.6k
  • 1
  • 26
  • 63

enter image description here

There is an official example, that we can set clusters number, however.

However, when I set the number to run the example, funny thing happens.

The same problem in ClusteringComponents

enter image description here

The problem is , accordingAccording to the theory of Spectral MethodClustering method, the feature number is the same to the eigenvectors sliced to use, which could be set by hand.

And because Another reason is setting the number is the need for the final step of Spectral Clustering when using Kmeans method. 

And this is also one feature of Spectral Clustering method.

So, what's the reasons for mathematica's strange behavior? Is it a bug? I'm on Mac version of 13.1.

Meanwhile, in GaussianMixture method, we can alsoca choose more components to clusterclustering some data.

There is a same problem in ClusteringComponents method.

FindClusters introduced in Year 2007. ClusteringComponents introduced in Year 2010.

Now is Year 2022, I think many people may try this method.

enter image description here

There is official example, that we can set clusters number, however, when I set the number to run the example, funny thing happens.

The same problem in ClusteringComponents

enter image description here

The problem is , according to the theory of Spectral Method, the feature number is the same to the eigenvectors sliced to use.

And because setting the number is the need for the final step of Spectral Clustering when using Kmeans method. And this is also one feature of Spectral Clustering method.

So, what's the reasons for mathematica's strange behavior? Is it a bug?

Meanwhile, in GaussianMixture method, we can also choose more components to cluster some data.

There is a same problem in ClusteringComponents method.

enter image description here

There is an official example, that we can set clusters number.

However, when I set the number to run the example, funny thing happens.

The same problem in ClusteringComponents

enter image description here

According to the theory of Spectral Clustering method, the feature number is the same to the eigenvectors sliced to use, which could be set by hand. Another reason is setting the number is the need for the final step of Spectral Clustering when using Kmeans method. 

And this is also one feature of Spectral Clustering method.

So, what's the reasons for mathematica's strange behavior? Is it a bug? I'm on Mac version of 13.1.

Meanwhile, in GaussianMixture method, we ca choose more components to clustering some data.

There is a same problem in ClusteringComponents method.

FindClusters introduced in Year 2007. ClusteringComponents introduced in Year 2010.

Now is Year 2022, I think many people may try this method.

added 46 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
HyperGroups
  • 8.6k
  • 1
  • 26
  • 63

Why Spectral Method and GaussianMixture in FindClusters and ClusteringComponents can't set the number of Clusters?

enter image description here

There is official example, that we can set clusters number, however, when I set the number to run the example, funny thing happens.

The same problem in ClusteringComponents

enter image description here

The problem is , according to the theory of Spectral Method, the feature number is the same to the eigenvectors sliced to use.

And because setting the number is the need for the final step of Spectral Clustering when using Kmeans method. And this is also one feature of Spectral Clustering method.

So, what's the reasons for mathematica's strange behavior? Is it a bug?

Meanwhile, in GaussianMixture method, we can also choose more components to cluster some data.

There is a same problem in ClusteringComponents method.

Why Spectral Method and GaussianMixture in FindClusters can't set the number of Clusters?

enter image description here

There is official example, that we can set clusters number, however, when I set the number to run the example, funny thing happens.

enter image description here

The problem is , according to the theory of Spectral Method, the feature number is the same to the eigenvectors sliced to use.

And because setting the number is the need for the final step of Spectral Clustering when using Kmeans method. And this is also one feature of Spectral Clustering method.

So, what's the reasons for mathematica's strange behavior? Is it a bug?

Meanwhile, in GaussianMixture method, we can also choose more components to cluster some data.

Why Spectral Method and GaussianMixture in FindClusters and ClusteringComponents can't set the number of Clusters?

enter image description here

There is official example, that we can set clusters number, however, when I set the number to run the example, funny thing happens.

The same problem in ClusteringComponents

enter image description here

The problem is , according to the theory of Spectral Method, the feature number is the same to the eigenvectors sliced to use.

And because setting the number is the need for the final step of Spectral Clustering when using Kmeans method. And this is also one feature of Spectral Clustering method.

So, what's the reasons for mathematica's strange behavior? Is it a bug?

Meanwhile, in GaussianMixture method, we can also choose more components to cluster some data.

There is a same problem in ClusteringComponents method.

Source Link
HyperGroups
  • 8.6k
  • 1
  • 26
  • 63

Why Spectral Method and GaussianMixture in FindClusters can't set the number of Clusters?

enter image description here

There is official example, that we can set clusters number, however, when I set the number to run the example, funny thing happens.

enter image description here

The problem is , according to the theory of Spectral Method, the feature number is the same to the eigenvectors sliced to use.

And because setting the number is the need for the final step of Spectral Clustering when using Kmeans method. And this is also one feature of Spectral Clustering method.

So, what's the reasons for mathematica's strange behavior? Is it a bug?

Meanwhile, in GaussianMixture method, we can also choose more components to cluster some data.