Timeline for Why can't this DiscretizeRegion display in full
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2020 at 2:41 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 21 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jan 24, 2020 at 2:37 | answer | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 23, 2020 at 1:03 | vote | accept | A little mouse on the pampas | ||
| Jan 22, 2020 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/1220043451905069056 | ||
| Jan 22, 2020 at 9:50 | answer | added | kglr | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 22, 2020 at 5:39 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 21, 2020 at 8:01 | comment | added | Henrik Schumacher |
I am puzzled. Usually, increasing the resolution with the option MaxCellMeasure helps, but here it seem as if DiscretizeRegion would not be able to compute a decent bounding box. Providing an eplicit bounding box with DiscretizeRegion[\[ScriptCapitalR], {{-6, +6}, {-6, +6}, {-1, 2}}, MaxCellMeasure -> (1 -> 0.01)] helps, but then MaxCellMeasure option is entirely ignored. This is certainly a bug; please contact the support.
|
|
| Jan 21, 2020 at 3:55 | comment | added | AsukaMinato | try this ? mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/211178/… | |
| Jan 21, 2020 at 3:01 | history | asked | A little mouse on the pampas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |