Timeline for Solution of a system of ODE with Dsolve
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 13:01 | comment | added | Mariusz Iwaniuk |
@bbgodfrey.Yes Maple is better for solving differential equations. 12000.org/my_notes/kamek/mma_12_maple_2019/KEse1.htm#x3-20001
|
|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 12:17 | history | edited | bbgodfrey |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 12:05 | history | edited | bbgodfrey | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved format
|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 12:01 | comment | added | bbgodfrey | @MariuszIwaniuk Thanks for checking. Although I do not use Maple, I surmise from comparisons posted on this site that it is better than Mathematica at solving differential equations. | |
| Oct 13, 2019 at 8:19 | comment | added | Mariusz Iwaniuk |
@bbgodfrey.Oh No,I made a mistake ,Maple can solve for {x,y} and for {x,y,z}.Yes Yours answer is correct.
|
|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 4:02 | comment | added | bbgodfrey |
@MariuszIwaniuk Can Maple solve for {x, y} without z, as in my answer below?
|
|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 4:00 | history | edited | bbgodfrey |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 3:57 | answer | added | bbgodfrey | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 12, 2019 at 18:41 | comment | added | Mariusz Iwaniuk | Maple cannot do it, either. | |
| Oct 12, 2019 at 18:40 | comment | added | Nasser | I do not think there is analytical solution to this. Try numerical. | |
| Oct 12, 2019 at 18:38 | comment | added | cabri61 | hi. thank you for reply.i edited the post to become more clear. | |
| Oct 12, 2019 at 18:37 | history | edited | cabri61 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 425 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2019 at 17:57 | comment | added | Mariusz Iwaniuk | Yours code give me: "DSolve::deqx: Supplied equations are not differential or integral equations of the given functions."? | |
| Oct 12, 2019 at 17:50 | history | edited | cabri61 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 12, 2019 at 17:42 | history | asked | cabri61 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |