Timeline for Determining Which Pattern Correlates with Each Sublist The Most
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2016 at 21:16 | vote | accept | Alejandro Braun | ||
| Sep 12, 2016 at 21:16 | vote | accept | Alejandro Braun | ||
| Sep 12, 2016 at 21:16 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2016 at 21:16 | vote | accept | Alejandro Braun | ||
| Sep 12, 2016 at 21:16 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2016 at 10:55 | answer | added | Simon Woods | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 14:09 | answer | added | ubpdqn | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 14:09 | comment | added | Alejandro Braun | Your comment actually reminded me of a previous recommendation from a past question to map the correlation function over the data (shown in the edited portion of the question). Now I just need to find the position of the value with the greatest distance from zero each sublist. | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 14:06 | history | edited | Alejandro Braun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 513 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2016 at 12:24 | comment | added | Simon Woods |
Have you tried Correlation ?
|
|
| Sep 10, 2016 at 1:52 | comment | added | Alejandro Braun | Correction, it seems to be multiplying as stated before and then adding the values in each resulting sublist. | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 1:42 | comment | added | Alejandro Braun | @bills ListCorrelate seems to be multiplying each value in each pattern by the value in the equivalent position in data. Am I doing something wrong? It isn't returning the correlation between two lists. | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 0:46 | comment | added | bill s |
Have a look at ListCorrelate.
|
|
| Sep 9, 2016 at 23:37 | history | asked | Alejandro Braun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |