Timeline for Solve 3D Electric Field Using FEA
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 9, 2023 at 11:49 | history | edited | user64494 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
May 9, 2023 at 5:08 | history | edited | user21 |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 28, 2016 at 17:03 | vote | accept | Young | ||
Jun 27, 2016 at 17:11 | answer | added | Young | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 27, 2016 at 3:26 | comment | added | user21 |
Try a 2D example first and the extend that to 3D. Also, reg = {bmeshShell, bmeshCylinA, bmeshCylinB} is not how it works. I think I'd start expressing the region as an ImplicitRegion .
|
|
Jun 25, 2016 at 18:18 | comment | added | Jason B. |
I think it should be more like this, sol = NDSolveValue[{Inactive[Laplacian][u[x, y, z], {x, y, z}] == 0, DirichletCondition[u[x, y, z] == 0, bmeshShell], DirichletCondition[u[x, y, z] == 30000, bmeshCylinA], DirichletCondition[u[x, y, z] == 30000, bmeshCylinB]}, u, {x, y, z} \[Element] shell] but I still don't get it to give me an answer. Maybe we can get @user21 to take a look at this, he's the expert
|
|
Jun 25, 2016 at 18:14 | comment | added | Young | Yes. Zero potential at the shell and 30 000 at each cylinder. I'm sure DirichletCondition is wrong and the region isn't setup correctly either. I'm working on figuring out the region definition now. | |
Jun 25, 2016 at 18:08 | comment | added | Jason B. |
How do your boundary conditions work? Are you saying you want the function u[x, y, z] to be zero at the bmeshShell boundary and 30000 at the other two boundaries? I think the syntax of your DirichletCondition is not correct
|
|
Jun 22, 2016 at 23:35 | history | asked | Young | CC BY-SA 3.0 |