3,190
reputation
1
5
26

user42582
top 7% this year

Bitter experience has shown that most of the time that Mathematica doesn't perform as expected is due to poor programming or incomplete understanding of the underlying task.

Mathematica is relatively easy to use without any prior knowledge but gets progressively difficult to master without assistance. Learning to perform more intricate programming - other than simply evaluating built-ins - has a steep learning curve, which the Documentation center and this site make considerably smoother.

I've always wondered what playing 3D chess - Trekkie style - would feel like and I assume that thinking about evaluation precedence steps and designing a proper function that fits a certain need must be the closer it gets to that.

ps. I'm lousy at regular chess, I'm marginally better with Mathematica.

114
answers
36
questions
~24k
people reached
  • Greece
  • Member for 2 years, 10 months
  • 192 profile views
  • Last seen 29 mins ago

Top tags (108)

Score 68
Posts 35
Posts % 23
Score 41
Posts 16
Score 21
Posts 17
Score 16
Posts 9
Score 14
Posts 8
Score 14
Posts 7

Top posts (150) All Questions Answers | Votes Newest

View all questions and answers

Badges (32)

Gold

1

Rarest

Silver

5

Rarest

Bronze

26

Rarest