# Tag Info

Accepted

### Mathematica 13.0 simplifies trigonometric integral wrong

It's not too uncommon for Integrate to return something which has a special case that can't be evaluated properly without taking a limit. In your case there is a ...
• 19.2k

### Integral of orthogonal Bessel functions

The OP's integral is missing information about the subscripted variables (which I avoid) and the change of coordinates leading to the interval from b to ...
• 213k

### Mathematica 13.0 simplifies trigonometric integral wrong

Here's a way to eliminate the singularities in the answer, provided you can be happy removing a singularity of the form Sin[u]/u with ...
• 213k
Accepted

### Plotting, Integrating two variable function with cross-restricted domain

For the plot you can use RegionFunction, which takes a pure function which takes x, y, and z values:: ...
• 123k
Accepted

### Integration over an implicit region

You want the region of integration to be defined by inequalities, rather than equalities. Your region can be described as follows: ...
• 58.4k

...
• 120k

### Mathematica 13.0 simplifies trigonometric integral wrong

Under natural assumptions one obtains ...
• 16.7k

### Symbolic scalar-by-matrix derivative

I tried the NCAlgebra package: << NC; << NCAlgebra; SNC[X, A] NCGrad[tr[tp[tp[X] ** A] ** (tp[X] ** A)], A] And ...
• 1,626

### Getting the same result from Integrate as Probability

Got it figured out, Mathematica just wants some assumptions about the integration variables and needs GenerateConditions->False: ...
• 819
1 vote

### Numerical Plot for an example

When we use NDSolveValue, the result sol is the interpolation function. It is difference to ...
• 30.6k
1 vote
Accepted

### Integrate: slow and wrong results

To investigate what's happening during the integration try using EvaluatioMonitor or StepMonitor.
• 26

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible