Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with functions
Search options not deleted
user 96078
Questions about the use of built-in Mathematica functions, including pure functions.
0
votes
0
answers
116
views
Short forms for function-parameter combinations?
I find these to be very convenient, particularly since I use the base-10 log fairly frequently:
Log[2, n]=> Log2@n
Log[10, n] => Log10@n
These represent a very specific type of syntactic sugar, in w …
- 3,643
0
votes
Creating a function for a traditional output for integrates
I believe this accomplishes what you want:
First we define the function sc (for Script):
sc[symb_] :=
Which[LowerCaseQ[ToString[symb]],
Symbol[StringJoin["\\[Script", ToUpperCase@ToString[symb], " …
- 3,643