Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with procedural-programming
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 81
Questions about Mathematica's procedural programming paradigm.
46
votes
Accepted
Are there any cases when For[] loops are reasonable?
To my mind, there are at least two cases when For loops are ok:
Inside Compile, or in code which is being written with Compile in mind
When your inner loops are vectorized or made efficient by some …
- 115k
6
votes
Accepted
Functional equivalent of a For loop referring to consecutive elements in a list
Here are two possibilities. First, use MovingMap:
ClearAll[av];
av[{l_, 0, r_}] := (l + r)/2;
av[{_, m_, _}] := m;
and then
smoothMM[list_] := Join[{First@list}, MovingMap[av, list, 3], {Last@lis …
- 115k