Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with syntax-highlighting
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 38205
Questions about highlighting for Mathematica input in the Mathematica front-end, and Wolfram Workbench.
8
votes
Accepted
Is there a syntax coloring type that highlights only when not in a list?
Here is my argument for why I think this is not possible:
First, we'll gather all the SyntaxInformation out there and GroupBy key:
sinfoAll =
Association@
ToExpression[
Join[
Names["*` …
- 47.1k
7
votes
Accepted
Is it possible to make a notebook behave like text editor such as Sublime Text with regard t...
To be honest, I still don't know what you're looking for since 90% of what is in your screenshot is already in Mathematica, but if you want to customize, here's something that'll do that on a single N …
- 47.1k
5
votes
How to program a F::argx message?
There's a nice internal method for this that has existed since at least 10.4: System`Private`ArgumentsWithRules.
You can use it to define a nicely handled function like so:
f[args___] :=
With[
{
…
- 47.1k
4
votes
Accepted
Why does SyntaxInformation "ColorEqualSigns" color like wrong options?
So I remembered running into this while answering an old SyntaxInformation based question, but here's a more systematic way to get at it.
Note that this has been pointed out on the StackExchange both …
- 47.1k