Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
This tag is reserved for questions where the problem has been vetted by this community and the observed behavior is confirmed to be a bug. Please do not use this tag for new questions. Please use the standard bugs header instead of version tags in conjunction with this tag.
8
votes
Accepted
What is wrong with RuleCondition here?
Update Jan 22nd: WRI Tech Support indicates that the fixes for all the test cases below, including the ones that don't depend on SameQ, may land in the next point release. The fixes could miss the poi …
20
votes
2
answers
734
views
What is wrong with RuleCondition here?
Bug introduced in 9.0 or earlier and fixed in 10.4
Hold@1`5 /. x_Real :> RuleCondition[N@x, True]
Hold@1`5 /. x_Real :> RuleCondition[N@2`5, True]
Hold@2`5 /. x_Real :> RuleCondition[N@2`5, True]
H …
6
votes
Why is this evaluation halved when adding units?
It is because a transformation rule in the SimplifyDump context is written without taking into account that Mathematica currently doesn't simplify zeroed Quantitiy expressions to a plain zero, which p …