Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 12679

Tags for questions about convolution, including the Mathematica functions Convolve, DiscreteConvolve, ListConvolve, DirichletConvolve, ImageConvolve, and convolutions using Fourier, FourierTransform, or LaplaceTransform.

3 votes

The curious case of Convolve function

It's my understanding that the convolution operation is supposed to be both commutative and associative. … Evaluate[Convolve[Evaluate[Convolve[v[x, dispersion], u[x, delay, dispersion], x, y, Assumptions -> x >= 0]], s[f, y, delay, dispersion], y, t, Assumptions -> y >= 0]]]; If we then compute the convolution
Matt's user avatar
  • 455
2 votes
Accepted

Is there an option for InverseLaplaceTransform to make Mathematica use the convolution theor...

I modified @xzczd's code and came up with the following wrapper for the inverse Laplace transform: ilpt[(h : List | Plus | Equal)[a__], s_, t_] := ilpt[#, s, t] & /@ h[a] ilpt[a_ b_, s_, t_] := Modu …
Matt's user avatar
  • 455
1 vote
1 answer
76 views

Is there an option for InverseLaplaceTransform to make Mathematica use the convolution theor...

By default, it appears that Mathematica won't use the convolution theorem to write an inverse Laplace transform in the form of a convolution of two functions. … So, InverseLaplaceTransform[1/(s+1)*LaplaceTransform[f[t],t,s],s,t] should be able to be written as the convolution of e^-t and f[t]. But, Mathematica doesn't do that automatically. …
Matt's user avatar
  • 455