Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with simplifying-expressions
Search options not deleted
user 10763
Questions on manipulating complicated expressions and making them look simpler using Simplify, FullSimplify and Reduce.
3
votes
1
answer
349
views
Why do I get Floor and Ceiling in my output despite my assumptions
I am trying to simplify the following expression.
Sum[
Binomial[2 k, m] (1 + (-1)^m)/2 Beta[(1 + m)/2, (n - 2)/2]
(Gamma[(1 + m)/2] Gamma[1/2 (-1 + 2 k - m + n)])^2 ,
{m, 0, 2 k}]
Before …
- 2,305
1
vote
1
answer
86
views
simplifying the range of two definite integrals
Today, I tried to obtain the solution of the following equation,
sol = DSolve[ {m v'[t] + \[Gamma] v[t] == \[Xi][t] , v[0] == v0}, v[t], t]
The solution, of course, can be easily obtained and the …
- 2,305
2
votes
Accepted
Simplifying a complex function with assumptions
Try this one.
Assuming[-1 < x < 1, Abs[F[x] + 1/3] // ComplexExpand // FullSimplify ]
- 2,305