3
$\begingroup$

I would like to use PlanetData to get µ, the product of the Gravitational constant G and a planet's mass m.

This property is listed in the documentation (Mathematica v10.1.0.0) for PlanetData as the property "GravitationalConstantMassProduct".

Unfortunately, the property appears unknown upon execution:

PlanetData["Earth", "GravitationalConstantMassProduct"]

Missing["UnknownProperty", {"Planet", "GravitationalConstantMassProduct"}]

In addition, the property also does not appear to be in the list of properties when queried as follows:

PlanetData["Properties"]

Given that this is a highly useful constant (known to far greater accuracy than a planet's mass FWIW), I'd like to know what has happened to it.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ wolframalpha.com/input/… $\endgroup$ Jun 3, 2015 at 19:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To expand on @belisarius comment - it seems to be a recurring feature of Wolframs Curated Data that the Mathematica version of it tends to be the poor relation of the similar dataset held in W|A. There are similar issues with CountryData $\endgroup$ Jun 3, 2015 at 19:53
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In case anyone's wondering why we don't just multiply EntityProperty["Planet", "Mass"] by Quantity["GravitationalConstant"]: we can measure $\mu=MG$ with much greater accuracy (~9 decimal places) than we can measure $G$, or by extension, $M$ (~4 decimal places). $\endgroup$ Jun 5, 2015 at 1:37
  • $\begingroup$ @2012rcampion Yes, thank you; this is exactly the reason I'd prefer to have µ. $\endgroup$ Jun 6, 2015 at 12:18

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$
WolframAlpha["mars Gravitational Constant  mass product", {{"Result", 1}, "NumberData"}]

4.28*10^13

or

WolframAlpha["mars Gravitational Constant  mass product", {{"Result", 1}, "ComputableData"}]

Quantity[4.28*10^13, ("Meters")^3/("Seconds")^2]

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I guess, WA or example data isn't going to be too useful here. I couldn't force WA to give answers to more than two decimal places. $\endgroup$
    – LLlAMnYP
    Jun 5, 2015 at 11:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps data accuracy doesn't warrant more digits. Wikipedia has two more digits for Mars. $\endgroup$ Jun 5, 2015 at 11:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.