Is there a way to add newer functions to a configuration file so that Workbench 2.0 is useable for development with 10.1?

Also, are there changes that can be made so that Workbench 2.0 can be used to Debug Mathematica 10.1?

Are there any existing Eclipse add-in that support Mathematica 9, 10 or 10.1?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. We all are waiting for Workbench 3.0. Maybe we should start a petition like the undo one. It looks to me that Wolfram does not take external programmers serious enough, or am I wrong and the release of Workbench 3.0 is imminent? Any comments from WRI? $\endgroup$ May 12, 2015 at 20:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We have a beta version of Workbench 3.0 available. I believe tech support will give it to you if you have Workbench 2.0. $\endgroup$
    – Stefan R
    May 12, 2015 at 21:48
  • $\begingroup$ I have the Workbench 3.0 Build 78 Beta. This was usable but started running into problems with Project files becoming corrupt and could no longer debug or edit files. Has there been an update since build 78? $\endgroup$ May 13, 2015 at 19:37
  • $\begingroup$ I have obtained a copy of the Workbench 3.0 Beta - it appears to be the same package (Build 78) that I received a number of months ago. There were a number of issues with Build 78 - but on-the-whole, it could be used. I does not appear that any development on WB is happening. $\endgroup$ May 14, 2015 at 12:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Cloud Development may be a solution for some developers - development tools may be fairly good here. In my case - due to contractual concerns on security,intellectual property concerns and a serious obligation to protect data and privacy with real consequences for violation, Cloud Development is a complete non-starter. There is still a real need for stand-alone development. $\endgroup$ May 14, 2015 at 12:48


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.