2
$\begingroup$

I have another task that somehow should be trivial. Suppose I have the following expression

$$ \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{2}{9} x_i + 2 \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{9} x_i, $$

or in Mathematica-FullForm 

Plus[Sum[Times[Rational[2,9],Subscript[x,i]],List[i,1,n]],Times[2,Sum[Times[Rational[1,9],Subscript[x,i]],List[i,1,n]]]]

Obviously, this is equal to $ \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{4}{9} x_i $ but Mathematica 6 wouldn't see that. How can I teach Mathematica to simplify this expression in a most general way (the actual expressions I need to simplify are way more complicated, they involve multiple sums and are mostly generated by some other routines)?

EDIT (21.04.2015): By multiple sums, I meant the following general expression: $$ a \sum_{i_1=1}^n \ldots\sum_{i_k=1}^n b\cdot f(x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_k}) + c \sum_{i_1=1}^n \ldots \sum_{i_k=1}^n d\cdot g(x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_k}). $$ The constants $a,b,c,d$ may be arbitrarily complex, the $k$ may vary as well. I needed a rule that, when applied, produces $$ \sum_{i_1=1}^n \ldots \sum_{i_k=1}^n \left((a\cdot b) f(x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_k}) + (c \cdot d) g(x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_k})\right). $$

Based on your replies, I have concocted an amazingly simple solution :

HoldPattern[a_ Sum[c_, y___]] :> Sum[a c, y]
HoldPattern[Sum[a_ b_, y___] + Sum[c_ b_, y___]] :> Sum[Together[a+c] b, y]
Improve this question
$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

You may consider this, 

rl= (a_. Sum[b_. Subscript[x_, i_], {i_, i0_: 1, n_}]) :> 
   Sum[(a b) Subscript[x, i], {i, i0, n}];

exp = Sum[2/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}] + 
   2 Sum[1/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}];

Apply transformation rule repeatedly: 

exp //. rl

enter image description here

Collecting more than two sums: 

exp1 = 1 Sum[3/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}] + 
  3 Sum[1/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}] + 
  3 Sum[2/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}]

enter image description here

exp1 //. rl

resulting in

enter image description here

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please comment, why do you use the Default pattern (_.) here? What is the idea behind? $\endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    Apr 21, 2015 at 12:40
1
$\begingroup$

Use a replacement rule

rule = (a1_. * Sum[c1_. Subscript[x_, i_], {i_, i0_: 1, n_}] +
     a2_. * Sum[c2_. Subscript[x_, i_], {i_, i0_: 1, n_}]) :>
   Sum[(a1*c1 + a2*c2) Subscript[x, i], {i, i0, n}];

expr = Sum[2/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}] +
   2 Sum[1/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}];

expr /. rule

Sum[(4*Subscript[x, i])/9, {i, 1, n}]

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please comment, why do you use the Default pattern (_.) here? What is the idea behind? $\endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    Apr 21, 2015 at 12:41
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexeiBoulbitch - without the defaults expr won't match the pattern in rule. Define a rule2 without the defaults and evaluate expr /. rule2 $\endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 21, 2015 at 13:00
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, Bob, I understand that. I already played with it. My question is more, why it does not match without and matches with that definition? $\endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    Apr 21, 2015 at 13:49
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexeiBoulbitch - because the rule is more general than the specific example (expr). The rule allows additional factors which may or may not be present and in this case not all are present. To handle the missing factors the defaults must be explicitly invoked. For example only one of the sums in expr has an external factor but the rule handles none, one (either), or both. $\endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 22, 2015 at 3:31
  • $\begingroup$ Hanllon OK, thank you. This approach seems to should work also for integrals, such as expr = 3*Integrate[g[x], {x, 0, 1}] and rule = a_.*Integrate[f_[x], {x, a_: 0, b_}] -> a*Integrate[f[x], {x, a, b}] but it does not. The operation expr /. rule returns the initial expression. Could you please comment on the reason and difference? $\endgroup$
    – Alexei Boulbitch
    Apr 22, 2015 at 9:03
0
$\begingroup$

I found this question after having solved a similar issue. Here is my solution:

r = (a0_:1) Sum[t0_, i__] + (a1_:1) Sum[t1_, i__] :> Sum[a0 t0 + a1 t1, i]

Then, given the example in the accepted answer, recursively apply the rule:

exp1 = 1 Sum[3/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}] + 
  3 Sum[1/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}] + 
  3 Sum[2/9 Subscript[x, i], {i, 1, n}]

InputForm[% //. r]

Sum[(4*Subscript[x, i])/3, {i, 1, n}]
Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.