2
$\begingroup$

I have three plots defined as:

plot = 
  DateListPlot[data, {{2000, 12, 31}, {2007, 12, 31}}, 
    Frame -> True, Joined -> True, PlotRange -> All, 
    LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 15}, PlotStyle -> Black, ImageSize -> 900,
    AspectRatio -> 0.3, FrameLabel -> {"", "", Style["Plot", 15]}]

Then I wanted to combine these three plots so that they will be in one column:

GraphicsColumn[{plot1, plot2, plot3}]

The problem is that in this combined plot the individual plots appear narrower than when I plot them separately.

What am I doing incorrectly?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Please include some example data. Also loosely related: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/78192/… and several related questions under the search query for GraphicsGrid and related functions $\endgroup$
    – LLlAMnYP
    Commented Apr 13, 2015 at 9:46
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You're not really doing anything incorrectly, this is just the unpleasant behaviour of GraphicsColumn (-Row, -Grid, etc). These functions generate an object with head Graphics and use Inset to place your plots inside. The problem is, they set the size of the individual plots to {imagewidth, aspectratio*imagewidth} whereas for an individual plot it is the plot range that maintains your aspect ratio setting. In your case your plot is 900*324, but in the column it's 900*270 so to maintain AspectRatio->0.3 it has to be narrowed. $\endgroup$
    – LLlAMnYP
    Commented Apr 13, 2015 at 10:16

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

This isn't so much an answer as to how to fix this (one workaround is Column[{plot1,plot2,plot3}], instead of GraphicsColumn, but it has its drawbacks), but more of an explanation of what's happening.

First I generate some fake data and create a plot similar to yours:

data = SortBy[RandomReal[10, {10, 2}], First];
plot = ListPlot[data, Frame -> True, Joined -> True, PlotRange -> All,
LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 15}, PlotStyle -> Black, 
AspectRatio -> .3, ImageSize -> 900, 
FrameLabel -> {"", "", Style["Plot", 15]}]

ImageDimensions[plot]
(* {900, 324} *)

Then do

GraphicsColumn[{plot,plot,plot}]
(* Get result with narrower plots, than desired. Also their height is smaller *)

Now let's take a closer look at the structure of the output.

InputForm[%];
TableForm @@ %

Inset[(*Graphics of plot*), {472.5, -145.125}, ImageScaled[{0.5, 0.5}], {900, 270.}]...

Let's check out the documentation of Inset. It places the point ImageScaled[{.5,.5}] (the center) of plot at the point {472.5,-145.125} in the enclosing graphics object... and resizes plot to {900, 270}. I can't say, why exactly this is done like that, but it explains, why your plots in the column become narrower.

You have specified an AspectRatio of 0.3, which means that the height-to-width of the framed part of your plot is 0.3.

When sticking this into the Inset Mathematica lazily just says "let the height-to-width of the entire inset (including margins for ticks and labels) be 0.3" which is not the same thing. While the correct width of your image is maintained at 900, the height of the plot with margins is now constrained to 270 instead of 324. To maintain the aspect ratio of the plotrange at 0.3 it has to also become narrower. I guess, there's a number of ways to work around this, e.g. pass ImageSize->{900,324}, AspectRatio->Full to your plots. My preferred way (by no means the best) is detailed here

EDIT

Here's a test with DateListPlot:

xdata = DateList /@ Range[3.6*10*^9, 3.63*10*^9, .3*10*^7];
ydata = RandomReal[10, 11];
data = Transpose[{xdata, ydata}];
plot = DateListPlot[data, Frame -> True, Joined -> True, 
   PlotRange -> All, LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 15}, 
   PlotStyle -> Black, AspectRatio -> Full, ImageSize -> {900, 324}, 
   FrameLabel -> {"", "", Style["Plot", 15]}];
GraphicsColumn[{plot, plot, plot}]

This returns the desired result on my machine (MMA v10.0.1.0, Win7x64 Enterprise)

EDIT2 Here's how I prefer to arrange graphics into grids and such.

undistortedGraphicsColumn[list_] := 
 Module[{sizes = ImageDimensions /@ list, width},
  width = Max@sizes[[All, 1]];
  sizes = sizes[[All, 2]];
  Graphics[Table[
    Inset[list[[i]], {0, -Plus @@ sizes[[;; i]]}, 
     ImageScaled[{0, 0}]], {i, Length[list]}],
   ImageSize -> {width, Plus @@ sizes}, ImagePadding -> None, 
   PlotRange -> {{0, width}, {-Plus @@ sizes, 0}},
   AspectRatio -> Plus @@ sizes/width, PlotRangePadding -> None]]

Now this line will return the plots in a column exactly how they look individually:

undistortedGraphicsColumn[{plot,plot,plot}]

If you go with your original code now:

plot = 
  DateListPlot[data, {{2000, 12, 31}, {2007, 12, 31}}, 
    Frame -> True, Joined -> True, PlotRange -> All, 
    LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 15}, PlotStyle -> Black, ImageSize -> 900,
    AspectRatio -> 0.3, FrameLabel -> {"", "", Style["Plot", 15]}]

And stick it into my function, you don't get the problem with enormous ticks and the column shows the plots as they are originally defined.

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, @LLIAMnYP. But I do not understand where should I pass ImageSize->{900,324}, AspectRatio->Full. To the specification of plot1, plot2 and plot3 or to the specification of GraphicsColumn? :) $\endgroup$
    – Johny
    Commented Apr 15, 2015 at 18:30
  • $\begingroup$ To the specs of the individual plots. $\endgroup$
    – LLlAMnYP
    Commented Apr 15, 2015 at 18:34
  • $\begingroup$ It returns me charts on which there are only vertical lines, @LLIAMnYP $\endgroup$
    – Johny
    Commented Apr 16, 2015 at 6:20
  • $\begingroup$ I've included a test with DateListPlot in my edited answer. If it still doesn't work, it probably has to do with your data. In that case please include the code you're trying. $\endgroup$
    – LLlAMnYP
    Commented Apr 16, 2015 at 9:02
  • $\begingroup$ I want to plot list of numbers: list={13963.5, 18885.9, 16710.5, 14753.5, 11214.6, 98779.5,...} The code you have posted works for me as well. Is it possible that it is because I manually add the range of data for horizontal axes as specs of DateListPlot? (see above: DateListPlot[data, {{2000, 12, 31}, {2007, 12, 31}},...]) @LLIAMnYP $\endgroup$
    – Johny
    Commented Apr 16, 2015 at 9:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.