1
$\begingroup$

Consider a series like this:

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (c_n r^{2-n/2}+d_n r^{-n/2})$$

Sum[c[n]r^(2-n/2)+d[n]r^(-n/2),{n,Infinity}]

I want, now, to keep only the terms for which the power of $r$ is negative, i.e., the non diverging terms for $r\rightarrow\infty$, and send to zero all the c[n] and d[n] which correspond to a positive power of $r$.

After this, I would like to keep all the terms of the general sum that go to zero more slowly than $r^{2}$, e.g.the terms with $r^{-1}$, $r^{-1/2}$, with their respective coefficients. Notice that this can come from different $n$, so it is not enough in general to truncate the series.

How can I do this using Series? I can't manage it.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Like Sum[If[2 - n/2 >= 0, 0, c[n] r^(2 - n/2)] + d[n] r^(-n/2), {n, Infinity}]? $\endgroup$ – Dr. belisarius Mar 5 '15 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ @belisarius This is not practical when I have many different expressions as exponents. In the question I used a toy sum, but in general I would need to impose many more conditions on that If $\endgroup$ – usumdelphini Mar 5 '15 at 17:47
1
$\begingroup$

You can use Piecewise to filter out any components you do not desire:

(* your exclusion conditions *)
conds={2-n/2<0, (* possibly more *) };

filter[c_]:=Piecewise[{{1,And@@c}},0]

and then

Sum[filter[conds] c[n]r^(2-n/2) + filter[conds] d[n]r^(-n/2),{n,Infinity}]

This can easily be expanded for any conditions you might encounter.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It is a little but uncomfortable because it does not seem to work on the whole series. I mean, unless I multiply filter[cond] individually in front of each term that can give problems, it does not work. $\endgroup$ – usumdelphini Mar 5 '15 at 21:24
  • $\begingroup$ If for example I have Sum[c[n] r^(1-n/2)+d[n] r^(n/2-1),{n,Infinity}] this will give zero $\endgroup$ – usumdelphini Mar 5 '15 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ @usumdelphini: Sure you will have to filter all your expressions within the sum. I updated the answer accordingly. Were it not for an infinite sum, this would be totally different story. $\endgroup$ – Jinxed Mar 5 '15 at 22:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.