7
$\begingroup$

I have been thinking about a piece of code today, but I don't understand why I get different outputs from two in my mind similar Mathematical sums.

First I observe that the Table command for this:

Clear[n, s, a];
s = 1/2;
Table[Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 
    1, -a}*{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 
     1, -2*a}/{(n + 0)^s, (n + 1)^s, (n + 2)^s, (n + 3)^s, (n + 4)^
      s, (n + 5)^s}], {n, 1, 36, 6}]

and this:

Clear[n, s, a];
s = 1/2;
Table[Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 
    1, -a}*{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 
     1, -2*a}/{(6*n + 1)^s, (6*n + 2)^s, (6*n + 3)^s, (6*n + 4)^
      s, (6*n + 5)^s, (6*n + 6)^s}], {n, 0, 5}]

gives the same output starting:

$$\displaystyle \left\{1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}-\frac{a}{2}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{2}}-\frac{2 a}{\sqrt{3}}+\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} a^2,\frac{1}{\sqrt{7}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{11}}-\frac{2 a}{3}-\frac{a}{2 \sqrt{2}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{10}}+\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{3}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{13}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{17}}-\frac{a}{4}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{14}}-\frac{2 a}{\sqrt{15}}+\frac{\sqrt{2} a^2}{3},\frac{1}{\sqrt{19}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{23}}-\frac{a}{2 \sqrt{5}}-\frac{2 a}{\sqrt{21}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{22}}+\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{6}},\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{29}}-\frac{2 a}{3 \sqrt{3}}-\frac{a}{2 \sqrt{7}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{26}}+\sqrt{\frac{2}{15}} a^2,\frac{1}{\sqrt{31}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{35}}-\frac{a}{4 \sqrt{2}}-\frac{2 a}{\sqrt{33}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{34}}+\frac{a^2}{3}\right\}$$...

Then I did these two sums:

Clear[n, s, a];
s = 1/2;
Sum[Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 
    1, -a}*{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 
     1, -2*a}/{(n + 0)^s, (n + 1)^s, (n + 2)^s, (n + 3)^s, (n + 4)^
      s, (n + 5)^s}], {n, 1, Infinity, 6}]
Clear[n, s, a];
s = 1/2;
Sum[Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 
    1, -a}*{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 
     1, -2*a}/{(6*n + 1)^s, (6*n + 2)^s, (6*n + 3)^s, (6*n + 4)^
      s, (6*n + 5)^s, (6*n + 6)^s}], {n, 0, Infinity}]

which Mathematica 8 evaluates to:

$$\displaystyle \text{Sum}\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{1+n}}-\frac{2 a}{\sqrt{2+n}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{3+n}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{4+n}}+\frac{2 a^2}{\sqrt{5+n}},\{n,1,\infty ,6\}\right]$$

$$\displaystyle \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+6 n}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{2+6 n}}-\frac{2 a}{\sqrt{3+6 n}}-\frac{a}{\sqrt{4+6 n}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5+6 n}}+\frac{2 a^2}{\sqrt{6+6 n}}\right)$$

respectively. So far I did not know if these sums are equivalent. Then I wanted to set these sums equal to zero and solve for $a$:

Clear[n, s, a];
s = 1/2;
Solve[Sum[
   Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 
      1, -a}*{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 
       1, -2*a}/{(n + 0)^s, (n + 1)^s, (n + 2)^s, (n + 3)^s, (n + 4)^
        s, (n + 5)^s}], {n, 1, Infinity, 6}] == 0, a]
Clear[n, s, a];
s = 1/2;
Solve[Sum[
   Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 
      1, -a}*{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 
       1, -2*a}/{(6*n + 1)^s, (6*n + 2)^s, (6*n + 3)^s, (6*n + 4)^
        s, (6*n + 5)^s, (6*n + 6)^s}], {n, 0, Infinity}] == 0, a]

which outputs:

$\left\{\left\{a\to \left(4 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-4 \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]+2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3}\right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{2}{3}\right]-\surd \left(\left(-4 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]+4 \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]-2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]+\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3}\right]+\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{2}{3}\right]\right)^2-4 \left(2 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]\right) \left(2 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{6}\right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{5}{6}\right]\right)\right)\right)/\left(2 \left(2 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]\right)\right)\right\},\left\{a\to \left(4 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-4 \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]+2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3}\right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{2}{3}\right]+\surd \left(\left(-4 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]+4 \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]-2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]+\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3}\right]+\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{2}{3}\right]\right)^2-4 \left(2 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]\right) \left(2 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{6}\right]-\sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\frac{5}{6}\right]\right)\right)\right)/\left(2 \left(2 \sqrt{2} \text{HurwitzZeta}\left[\frac{1}{2},\infty \right]-2 \sqrt{2} \text{Zeta}\left[\frac{1}{2}\right]\right)\right)\right\}\right\}$

and the empty set:

$\{\}$

respectively.

For numerical reasons (setting infinity to a large number and evaluating) I believe that the complicated Zeta function expression is incorrect and that this is bug.

But I have a feeling though that the fault might have been made by me and not Mathematica. Where did I go wrong? Should the two sums give the same answer?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

So if i understand correctly you want to verify the equality of the two sums $$\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s}-\frac{a}{(n+1)^s}-\frac{2 a}{(n+2)^s}-\frac{a}{(n+3)^s}+\frac{1}{(n+4)^s}+\frac{2 a^2}{(n+5)^s} \;\text{where}\quad n=6k+1$$ and $$\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(6 n+1)^s}-\frac{a}{(6 n+2)^s}-\frac{2 a}{(6 n+3)^s}-\frac{a}{(6 n+4)^s}+\frac{1}{(6 n+5)^s}+\frac{2 a^2}{(6 n+6)^s}\;\text{where}\quad n=k$$ . You can verify this by executing the substitution in the first sum and comparing the summands of both sums. In Mathematica you could e.g. do it like this: With your definitions:

summand1 = Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 1, -a}
                *{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 1, -2*a}
                /{(n+0)^s, (n+1)^s, (n+2)^s, (n+3)^s, (n+4)^s, (n+5)^s}]
summand2 = Total[{1, -a, 1, -a, 1, -a}
                *{1, 1, -2*a, 1, 1, -2*a}
                /{(6*n+1)^s, (6*n+2)^s, (6*n+3)^s, (6*n+4)^s, (6*n+5)^s, (6*n+6)^s}]

{summand1 /. n->6*k+1, summand2 /. n-> k}

which give the same result:

Subtract @@ %
(* 0 *)
$\endgroup$
0
5
$\begingroup$

I don't believe there is a solution to the mathematical problem you are posing. Look at the second form of the series for large n.

Series[1/Sqrt[1 + 6 n] - a/Sqrt[2 + 6 n] - (2 a)/Sqrt[3 + 6 n] - a/Sqrt[4 + 6 n] + 1/Sqrt[5 + 6 n] + (2 a^2)/Sqrt[6 + 6 n], {n, \[Infinity], 2}]

yields

1/3 (Sqrt[6] - 2 Sqrt[6] a + Sqrt[6] a^2) Sqrt[1/n] + (-(1/(2 Sqrt[6])) + a/Sqrt[6] - a^2/Sqrt[6]) (1/n)^(3/2) + SeriesData[n, DirectedInfinity[1], {}, 1, 5, 2]

Unless the coefficient of Sqrt[1/n] is 0, that is a=1, the series diverges. However, if you set a=1 (the only value for which the infinite series converges) then the sum is what it is; it can't be set to zero. Numerically, it looks like it is less than -0.4.

While it's understandle that Mathematica could not solve the problem, I have no idea why it responded with the nonsense that it did.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Since you commented about the case "a=1", the value less than -0.4 is conjectured to be: s = 1/2; N[Zeta[s] (1 - 1/2^(s - 1) - 1/3^(s - 1) + 1/6^(s - 1)), 15] =-0.442816540414123... $\endgroup$ Jun 24, 2012 at 5:54
  • $\begingroup$ +1 You can also arrive at this conclusion by expanding the summand as a series in $n$ around $\infty$: the leading term, of order $n^{-1/2}$, has $2(1-a)^2$ for its coefficient. Because this will not converge when summed, the coefficient must equal zero. I suspect MMA obtained its solution by interpreting these summations as the analytic continuation of $\zeta(1/2,\ldots)$. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Jun 24, 2012 at 15:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.