0
$\begingroup$

I have a function like this.. $$ f[k]=\int_0^\infty Exp[-ax]x(Cos[bx])^{2}BesslJ[0,kx]dx $$ I want to know how many local maximuns this function has.. So I try to get the derivative of f[k] $$ g[k]=D[f[k],k]; $$ Then the result from mathematica is $$ g[k]=-6ka^{-4}(1+k^{2}/a^{2})^{-5/2}-3k(a-2ib)^{-4}(1+k^{2}/(a-2ib)^{2})^{-5/2}-3k(a+2ib)^{-4}(1+k^{2}/(a+2ib)^{2})^{-5/2},. $$

I need to get the results $$ g[k]==0,k=?? $$ Because in the function there is a & b,I use Solve..But it can't get the answer..Actually just the number of the solutions is necessary for me.. I am a beginner of the Mathematica..TKS in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Please post the code for f[x]. LaTeX is fine for typesetting, but it's better to have actual code. $\endgroup$ – DumpsterDoofus Feb 4 '15 at 0:51
  • $\begingroup$ TKS for your suggestion.. $\endgroup$ – Cici Feb 4 '15 at 0:57
  • $\begingroup$ One solution is x = 0. I believe that there are two more. $\endgroup$ – bbgodfrey Feb 4 '15 at 1:07
  • $\begingroup$ YES..x=0 is one of the answer...But I need the exact numbers of this function...Any solutions? $\endgroup$ – Cici Feb 4 '15 at 1:09
  • $\begingroup$ Are a and b both real with a > 0? $\endgroup$ – bbgodfrey Feb 4 '15 at 1:54
1
$\begingroup$

g[k]=0 is not easily simplified. So, I plotted g (with k and b both scaled to a):

Manipulate[ Plot[g /. {a -> 1, b -> b0}, {k, 0, 20}, PlotRange -> {-.01, .01}],
 {{b0, 1}, 0, 10, Appearance -> "Labeled"}]

A sample curve, for b = 6.12, is

g at 6.12

Manifestly, there are three zeros, one at k = 0 and the others at positions dependent on b. (The curve does not cross the axis at large k.)

Addendum

It also is instructive to plot f itself (again for b = 6.12)

f at 6.12

Thus, f has 2 maxima and one minimum.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ YES..U R right..I plan to try Manipulate k&a&b before but mathematica can't give the answer..U assumed a→1(or maybe some others) and now it works. TKS so much. $\endgroup$ – Cici Feb 4 '15 at 3:16
  • $\begingroup$ Actually a->1 is a renormalization without loss of generality. Glad to be of help. $\endgroup$ – bbgodfrey Feb 4 '15 at 3:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.