EDIT: CylindricalDecomposition
has been improved since I wrote this answer, probably in v11.2! Now it takes an optional topological operation argument. As a result, one can achieve the results described as connected
below simply by adding such an argument to CylindricalDecomposition
:
decomp = List @@ BooleanMinimize@CylindricalDecomposition[eqns, {x, y},
"Components"];
The code below is a bit of a cheat: it modifies sets acquired through cylindrical decomposition by converting <
to <=
and >
to >=
. This prevents some infinitesimally small gaps from being recognised as such, but wins the possibility of finding overlaps between cylindrical cells produced by CAD. It may still serve as a starting point for more "real-world" solutions.
This code constructs a pairwise graph from those DNF components of the decomposition for which their closed region overlaps with another. From this connected graph components are computed, and this gives more or less directly connected components you seek:
Module[{eqns, decomp, connected, regdim},
eqns = x^2 + y^2 <= 1 && x^2 + (y - 1/2)^2 >= 1/2 &&
! (0 <= y - x/2 <= 1/4) && ! (0 <= y/2 + x <= 1/4) &&
x^2 + (y + 3/4)^2 >= 1/32;
regdim =
RegionDimension@ImplicitRegion[Reduce[#, {x, y}, Reals], {x, y}] &;
decomp =
List @@ BooleanMinimize@CylindricalDecomposition[eqns, {x, y}];
connected =
Or @@@ ConnectedComponents@
Graph[decomp, UndirectedEdge @@@
Select[Subsets[decomp, {2}],
regdim[And @@ # //. {Less -> LessEqual, Greater -> GreaterEqual}] >= 0 &]];
(Quiet@RegionPlot[#, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1}, PlotPoints -> 100] & /@
{decomp, connected})~Join~
{FullSimplify[connected, (x | y) \[Element] Reals]}]
The result shows CAD result, "unified" connected components and each component:
{(Sqrt[1 - x^2] + y >=
0 && ((x > 2 y && 2/Sqrt[5] + x > 0 &&
Sqrt[6] + 5 x <= 1) || (Sqrt[6] + 5 x > 1 &&
Sqrt2 + 8 x <= 0 &&
Sqrt[2 - 4 x^2] + 2 y <= 1) || (x < 1/Sqrt[5] && 2 x + y < 0 &&
8 x >= Sqrt2) || (Sqrt2 + 8 x > 0 && 8 x < Sqrt2 &&
6 + Sqrt[2 - 64 x^2] + 8 y <= 0))) || (Sqrt[2 - 64 x^2] <=
6 + 8 y && ((8 x < Sqrt2 && 2 x + y < 0 &&
10 x >= 1) || (Sqrt2 + 8 x > 0 && 10 x < 1 &&
Sqrt[2 - 4 x^2] + 2 y <= 1))), (1 + x == 0 &&
y == 0) || (Sqrt[7] + 4 x == 0 &&
4 y == 3) || (Sqrt[1 - x^2] >=
y && ((1 + 2 Sqrt[19] + 10 x == 0 &&
Sqrt[1 - x^2] + y > 0) || (Sqrt[1 - x^2] + y >= 0 &&
1 + x > 0 &&
1 + 2 Sqrt[19] + 10 x < 0) || (1/Sqrt2 + x > 0 &&
Sqrt[7] + 4 x < 0 &&
1 + Sqrt[2 - 4 x^2] <= 2 y) || (1 + 2 Sqrt[19] + 10 x > 0 &&
1 + 2 x < 4 y && 1/Sqrt2 + x <= 0))) || (1/Sqrt2 + x > 0 &&
1 + 2 x < 4 y && Sqrt[2 - 4 x^2] + 2 y <= 1), (x == 1 &&
y == 0) || (Sqrt[1 - x^2] + y >=
0 && ((Sqrt[1 - x^2] >= y && x > 2/Sqrt[5] &&
x < 1) || (10 x > 2 + Sqrt[19] && 5 x < 1 + Sqrt[6] &&
Sqrt[2 - 4 x^2] + 2 y <= 1) || (x > 2 y &&
5 x >= 1 + Sqrt[6] && x <= 2/Sqrt[5]))) || (10 x <=
2 + Sqrt[19] && 4 x + 2 y > 1 &&
Sqrt[2 - 4 x^2] + 2 y <= 1), (4 x == Sqrt[7] &&
4 y == 3) || (4 x > Sqrt[7] && 10 x < 7 &&
1 + Sqrt[2 - 4 x^2] <= 2 y &&
y <= Sqrt[1 - x^2]) || (1 + 2 x < 4 y && Sqrt[1 - x^2] >= y &&
10 x >= 7)}
EDIT:
Here's an improvement to the case of infitesimal gaps. Instead of just rewriting CAD cells to closures, we search for intersection of one cell with RegionBoundary
of another. RegionPlot
visualisation is not particularly pretty in this case (there's a single point connecting upper and lower left side now), but that's not a problem caused by the connected components code. This version has a drawback of being considerably slower than the original answer.
Module[{eqns, decomp, connected, regconn},
eqns = x^2 + y^2 <= 1 && x^2 + (y - 1/2)^2 >= 1/2 &&
! (0 == y - x/2 && x != -3/4) && ! (0 == y/2 + x) &&
x^2 + (y + 3/4)^2 >= 1/32;
regconn =
Resolve@Exists[{x, y}, (x | y) \[Element] Reals,
RegionMember[
RegionIntersection[ImplicitRegion[#1, {x, y}],
RegionBoundary@ImplicitRegion[#2, {x, y}]], {x, y}]] &;
decomp =
List @@ BooleanMinimize@CylindricalDecomposition[eqns, {x, y}];
connected =
Or @@@ ConnectedComponents@
Graph[decomp, UndirectedEdge @@@
Select[Subsets[decomp, {2}],
regconn @@ # || regconn @@ Reverse@# &]];
(Quiet@RegionPlot[#, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1},
PlotPoints -> 100] & /@ {decomp, connected})~Join~
{FullSimplify[connected, (x | y) \[Element] Reals]}]
...
SemialgebraicComponentInstances
? $\endgroup$SemialgebraicComponentInstances
will give me at least one point from each connected component, but I need components themselves. $\endgroup$