# Version 10 of Mathematica in Windows XP

I obtained the latest version 10 of Mathematica however, when I start the installation the process aborts and a pop up window explains that "The program requires Windows NT version 6.0 or later". As far as I know, this means that version 10 is compatible only with Vista and all later versions of windows, am I right? In my PC I still have Windows XP SP3. So, is there a way to install version 10 in this OS? Currently, I have version 9 and runs like a charm. I refuse to believe that Wolfram made in purpose version 10 incompatible with XP.

• Why do you think they will support unsupported (even extended support) version of OS? – m0nhawk Jul 16 '14 at 8:41
• @m0nhawk Why not? There are still millions of XP users around the world. – Vaggelis_Z Jul 16 '14 at 8:45
• Microsoft itself no longer supports Windows XP, so why expect new Wolfram products work with it? – murray Jul 16 '14 at 20:28
• yet somehow Wolfram supports linux which isn't "supported" by anyone. – george2079 Jul 17 '14 at 18:11
• @george2079 linux is supported by several companies: e.g. RedHat, Canonical, SUSE, each with their own version schedule and EOL times. – Ruslan Jan 25 '19 at 9:45

I have contacted the Wolfram support ([CASE:1292216]):

Dear Andrew,

Thank you for contacting Wolfram Customer Service. We simply ended our support of XP shortly after Microsoft had announced they would no longer support XP themselves. XP is going to become to difficult to handle without any kind of support from Microsoft as many of the issues we would run into would be from the OS interaction with Mathematica and without updates for the OS each machine could almost be running its own version of XP. Please let us know if we may help further.

Regards, Wolfram Research, Inc.

The only solution: find an installed version and copy, but there is no guarantee it will work (mine worked on Windows XP on Hyper-V VM) and work correctly.

• If I understand correctly your sayings you suggest me to install v10 in Win 8 for example and then copy the entire installation folder from Program Files to my XP PC. Am I right? Another idea the came by to me: Since I have the setup .exe file, can I produce a portable version of it? Few months ago, I found a torrent with a portable v9 that runs in any PC without installation just from a USB stick. – Vaggelis_Z Jul 17 '14 at 20:22
• Yes, or ask someone with installed to share it. But take in account that you will need x86 version, so you need x86 version of Win8. About portable... I didn't have any experience with creating portable software, so can't advice anything. I think someone would definitely make it, and it would work seamlessly. – m0nhawk Jul 17 '14 at 20:25
• @m0nhawk I have not tried that yet but what about registry entries that V10 would create? – bobbym Jul 18 '14 at 15:11
• @bobbym there is nothing necessary for computations, only some system information, like version or file association (can be added manually). – m0nhawk Jul 18 '14 at 15:14
• Okay, sounds reasonable +1 – bobbym Jul 18 '14 at 15:17

One can use Microsoft Application Verifier to cheat the Windows version.

• Like so? I'm not sure if HighVersionLie also works for cheating on lower version numbers; can anyone confirm that this works? – Teake Nutma Sep 7 '14 at 9:12
• @Teake Nutma yes, it works. – Anixx Sep 7 '14 at 9:31
• Can you then amend your answer with a step-by-step procedure of how to get it working? At the very least, include the command line to wrap the installer in MAV. – Teake Nutma Sep 7 '14 at 9:33
• This one does not help – Kattern Jun 28 '15 at 15:02
• @Anixx Yea, shit. Checked the module name. If the installer executable file is m.exe, then the module name when it's started is somehow m.tmp. Works perfectly, upvoting, thanks! – dbanet Jul 10 '15 at 1:25