16
$\begingroup$

Bug introduced in 9.0.1 and fixed in 10.0.0


Consider

RSolve[{a[n + 1] == 2 a[n] + n (1 + 2^n), a[1] == 1}, a[n], n]

Mathematica 8 can solve this quickly, but Mathematica 9, even after being allowed to run for a long time, cannot give a result.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Strange, but this works : RSolve[{a[n + 1] == 2 a[n] + b[n], a[1] == 1}, a[n], n] /. b[m_] -> m (1 + 2^m). $\endgroup$ May 1, 2014 at 5:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I can confirm this behavior and think it is a bug. I have sent WRI tech support a report of this problem. I will post their answer when I receive it. $\endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    May 1, 2014 at 6:32
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @m_goldberg C'mon! It's clearly a feature! $\endgroup$ May 1, 2014 at 7:27
  • $\begingroup$ Sometimes internal functionality gets improved by making it more flexible, but in the course of doing so a good hard-coded algorithm that solves a specific problem gets broken. $\endgroup$ Mar 12, 2016 at 16:35

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I submitted a report about this problem to WRI tech support. I have received their reply and quote it part below.

Thank you for bringing this RSolve issue to our attention.

I can reproduce the situation you found on both Mathematica 9 and Mathematica prerelease and have filed a report on it.

I think it is safe to tag this question with .

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.