I'd quite like to be able to automatically generate C++ versions of certain mathematical expressions that I've manipulated in Mathematica. The resultant C++ code fragment is then going to be used independently of Mathematica.
Mathematica provides a CForm
function, which almost seems like what I want, but I can't get it to do basic conversions nor tell it how to convert Mathematica symbols into my C++ identifiers.
For example, I would like the output from CForm[x[0]^2]
or ToString[x[0]^2, CForm]
to be "std::pow(obj.x_[0], 2)"
. This can be a string; it doesn't need to be usable in Mathematica any more. Of course, my actual expressions of interest are a lot more complicated than this.
But:
- I don't have a way of telling Mathematica that symbol
x
is to be renamed toobj.x_
(not a valid symbol name in Mathematica so can't use it directly). String manipulation after conversion is too unreliable for this so a more direct method is preferred. - I can't tell Mathematica that
x
is an array, not a function, so it gives mex(0)
instead ofobj.x_[0]
. - Mathematica thinks I want to use its own
Power
function, but I'd really like to usestd::pow
.
Perhaps CForm
isn't suited to this task, but I would still appreciate a solution using any other available method if possible. I really think that Mathematica should be able to help me here, because it knows where I need brackets and so on.
I've tried:
Format[x[a_], CForm] :=
"obj.x_[" <> ToString[a, CForm] <> "]"
Format[Power[a_, b_], CForm] :=
"std::pow(" <> ToString[a, CForm] <> ", " <> ToString[b, CForm] <> ")"
ToString[x[0]^2, CForm]
but of course Power
is protected so the second SetDelayed
gives me an error, and my ToString[x[0]^2, CForm]
output is really weird (Power("obj.x_[0]",2)
) because I've tried to use strings in the Format
.
SymbolicC
instead ofCForm
. Have a look here. Would've been a dupe but is on SO, not here. It does not cover C++, but you can extend SymbolicC to cover the parts of C++ syntax you need. In general, this is a more robust solution. $\endgroup$CExpression
rather than thegetCFormNoPowersSymC
function there, butCExpression
doesn't convert an expression to SymbolicC, so all I can do with it is pass toToCCodeString
. This means I can't change the identifiers, and I'm still stuck withPower
instead ofstd::pow
(assuming I don't want to convert into repeated multiplication). $\endgroup$CForm
has always seemed to be one of those cases where somebody at Wolfram Research once said "this design we came up with for output formatting is so general, it would be easy to make it generate C, or TeX, or Fortran, so let's go ahead and document it!" -- and after a few years they realized that it's a lot harder problem than it looks, and quietly let it drop. (Another example would be the idea that users can write their own Front End and hook it up to the Mathematica kernel by using standard, documented MathLink calls.) $\endgroup$pow
and enable that call by a namespace declarationusing std::pow
in a proceeding line. $\endgroup$