3
$\begingroup$

I've been trying to get a clear story regarding the interaction of these three components before upgrading my system from Lion to Mavericks --- I can't afford a Mathematica disaster.

What I think is the case is: 1. Upgrading to Mavericks removes Java from the system (or perhaps installs Java 7). 2. MMA 9 requires Java 6, and the MMA installer gives you an option to install (downgrade?) to Java 6. 3. Once you have Java 6 installed, MMA works fine.

Does that sound correct? Does Wolfram indeed support MMA 9 on Mavericks?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, v9 works fine on Mavericks. The steps you describe are what's necessary. $\endgroup$
    – rm -rf
    Feb 27 '14 at 22:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You don't need to bother with Java at all. Apple provides Java 6, and this is what Mathematica uses. When I upgraded to Mavericks, Apple Java 6 was automatically removed. Mathematica was one of the first programs I started up afterwards. The OS automatically prompted me to install Apple Java 6, and after a click of a single button and a few minutes to download it, everything was working perfectly. $\endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Feb 27 '14 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ This article explains Java on Mavericks: support.wolfram.com/kb/12098 $\endgroup$
    – KAI
    Feb 27 '14 at 23:58
3
$\begingroup$

I can only agree with Szabolcs comment. Upgrading to Mavericks brought a lot of problems, but Mathematica worked from the first minute. Therefore, let me cite the comment into an answer:

You don't need to bother with Java at all. Apple provides Java 6, and this is what Mathematica uses. When I upgraded to Mavericks, Apple Java 6 was automatically removed. Mathematica was one of the first programs I started up afterwards. The OS automatically prompted me to install Apple Java 6, and after a click of a single button and a few minutes to download it, everything was working perfectly.

And here is the link to an official Woflram article which KAI posted:

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It all worked as advertised. Thanks for the help, all. $\endgroup$
    – rogerl
    Feb 28 '14 at 16:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.