I like to use Mathematica text cells for creating draft technical documents. When entering equations in a text cell, the ^ (hat accent) does not dynamically adjust its size to fit. It looks good if you enter x^, but if you wanted abc^, the ^ covers only the b. Anyone know how to make the ^ (and other accents) adjust to the size of the text?
18
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
-
$\begingroup$ Don't know how to do it automatically. You can change the font size of the hat when you use the upper script (ctrl-7). Still much work when you have to type the hat alot. $\endgroup$ – Lou Mar 10 '12 at 20:21
-
3$\begingroup$ Good question: how to create a custom extensible character $\endgroup$ – Rojo Mar 10 '12 at 20:40
-
1$\begingroup$ Okay, someone had to do it. $\endgroup$ – Mr.Wizard♦ Mar 11 '12 at 14:29
16
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
This answer is just a quick hack. I think that to make true extensible character might not be something that an end-user can do...
Anyway, redefine the formatting for OverHat using
OverHat /: MakeBoxes[OverHat[a_], form_] :=
With[{s = First[Rasterize[a, "RasterSize"]],
ab = MakeBoxes[a]}, With[{sl = N[2 Log[2 s]]},
InterpretationBox[OverscriptBox[ab,
TagBox[GraphicsBox[LineBox[{{-s, 0}, {0, sl}, {s, 0}}],
ImageSize -> {s, Automatic}], "LongOverHat",
Selectable -> False]], OverHat[a]]]]
Then, just type in the expression as per normal, e.g.,
,
and then select the OverHat expression and reformat the boxes using the menu command Cell > Convert To > Standard From
(which can also be done using the shortcut
CtrlShiftN) to get
. The FullForm of this expression is OverHat[abc].
Here's an example showing how the modified OverHat scales for longer expressions
The MakeBoxes command also works with TraditionalForm (CtrlShiftT), but you might want to modify it to include an
AdjustmentBox[..., BoxBaselineShift -> b] in order to get the vertical spacing looking right.
-
2$\begingroup$
Rasterize[..., "BoundingBox"]andRasterize[..., "RasterSize"]may be of interest. $\endgroup$ – Szabolcs Mar 11 '12 at 9:55 -
-
$\begingroup$ Thanks @Szabolcs - it is of interest! And thanks Mr.Wizard. $\endgroup$ – Simon Mar 11 '12 at 14:24
-
$\begingroup$ this is great - thank you for the quick response $\endgroup$ – gamma Mar 13 '12 at 7:05
-
$\begingroup$ Not a problem @gamma. If you're happy with the answer, press the checkmark button at the top left of the answer. Also, maybe submit a request to Wolfram Research for a proper extensible circumflex glyph... $\endgroup$ – Simon Mar 13 '12 at 11:11
