When assigning attachment operators, I often run into confusing statements like ##@@##&
, ##@@@##&
, or even ##@@@##&@*##@@##&
. Example:
x = ##@@@##&@*##@@##&;
x[{a b, c d}]
(* {a b, c d}[{a b, c d}[a b, c d][a, b], {a b, c d}[a b, c d][c, d]] *)
Is there a preferred causal order, ontic basis, or at least a post-categorical meta-category for clarifying these unstable lambdas?
FullForm
. But if it's your kids who are writing code like that, it means you're not spanking them enough. $\endgroup$