Using Netlink, when we have more users than Mathematica licenses (used in a pool), we get messages such as:

Error code: 11. Connected MathLink program has closed the link, but there might still be data underway,

that I translate into a more user friendly message.

There's a Wolfram License Management Monitor on a server and it generates these reports:

Ref: http://uczelnia.mazovia.edu.pl/info/mathematica.html enter image description here

Unfortunately the License Server is locked down (its still in the network unlike this: How to access Mathematica license server (being outside of the local network)) and I can't install IIS or a Windows Service to retrieve the License Report on demand.

Is there a command that can be used in Mathematica (via Netlink or Front-End) to get this information?


As per http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/program/monitorlm.html, I can't get this command to work:

monitorlm  "servername"
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Is that not an executable command? eg here it'd be run from the command line as /usr/local/math/MathLM800/bin/monitorlm license (for example) $\endgroup$ – acl Nov 21 '13 at 9:34
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the comment, in the environment I am working in.. it wont fly, unfortunately my hands are tied. Hence my recommendation is to shell the exe with a script to capture the details. $\endgroup$ – WolframFan Nov 21 '13 at 9:59
  • $\begingroup$ You will have to get proper privileges to access mathlm. A license user does (quite probably by design) not have access to the license server. $\endgroup$ – Yves Klett Dec 21 '13 at 12:51

monitorlm is an exe that sits on a License Server, its not a Mathematica command.

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ This is perhaps more suited to a comment (sans screenshot)? $\endgroup$ – Yves Klett Dec 21 '13 at 12:46
  • $\begingroup$ Whats Sans Screenshot? how do I post a image in a comment? $\endgroup$ – WolframFan Dec 21 '13 at 23:54
  • $\begingroup$ You don't. As I understand your question, this is not an answer to it. Perhaps you can elaborate. $\endgroup$ – Yves Klett Dec 22 '13 at 6:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.