0
$\begingroup$

I am looking for the maximum of the function

$$V(r^*)=\left( 1-\dfrac{2m}{r} \right)\left( \dfrac{l(l+1)}{r^2}-\dfrac{6m}{r^3} \right)$$

in the coordinate $r^*$ for given $l$ and $m$, where $r^*=r+2m \ln(r-2m)$.

How can I do it?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ what have you tried? $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Mar 1 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform I am clueless, FindMaximum gives the maximum for the variabel r I do not know how to find the maximum in r^* $\endgroup$ – mattiav27 Mar 1 at 16:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ find the maximum in terms of $r$, and then plug that expression into $r^*$? $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Mar 1 at 16:32
  • $\begingroup$ Please clarify the function definition! $\endgroup$ – Ulrich Neumann Mar 1 at 16:36
  • $\begingroup$ @UlrichNeumann I have the potential V defined in terms of the coordinate r', but I need the maximum of the potential in terms of the variable r*` whch depends on r $\endgroup$ – mattiav27 Mar 1 at 16:39
2
$\begingroup$

The necessary condition to maximize is D[V,r]/D[r*,r] which can be solved analytically

sol=Solve[0 == D[(1 - 2 m/r) ((l (l + 1))/r^2 - (6 m)/r^3), r]/D[r + 2 m Log[r - 2 m], r], r]
(* {{r -> 2 m}, 
{r -> (9 m + 3 l m + 3 l^2 m - 
Sqrt[-96 (l + l^2) m^2 + (-9 m - 3 l m - 3 l^2 m)^2])/(2 (l + l^2))}, 
{r -> (9 m + 3 l m + 3 l^2 m + 
Sqrt[-96 (l + l^2) m^2 + (-9 m - 3 l m - 3 l^2 m)^2])/(2 (l + l^2))}}*)

Knowing the parameters l,m you might check the result to be a maximum!

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ ...i'm kinda confused. The function $V(z)$ clearly diverges (to $\infty$) at $z\to0^+$, so how can it have a maximum at all? Your solutions seem to be minima (or local maxima), not a global maximum! $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Mar 1 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform It's only a necessary condition for an extremum. I didn't check for maximum! The influence of the constraint shoulden'd be disregared. $\endgroup$ – Ulrich Neumann Mar 1 at 18:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean by "the constraint", but the function is unbounded from above for all $m,l$, so the problem has no solution... $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Mar 1 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform The constraint (sorry for my wording) r*=r+2Log[r-2m], m>0 shows, that real r* only exist if r>2m. Thus the singularity V[0+] is excluded . $\endgroup$ – Ulrich Neumann Mar 2 at 8:03
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see, that makes sense! (But do note that $r=2m$ is a boundary, so the maximum could in principle be located there. Strictly speaking, one should test that value too, together with the three you write in your answer). $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Mar 3 at 22:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.