# ColorFunction based on array index in ListLinePlot

ColorFunction specifies that for ListLinePlot it takes the $$x,y$$ data as inputs. I, however, would like to take the array index (or in general some external array of the same length) as the input for ColorFunction so that, if we use a rainbow color scheme, the earlier points show up as purple while the last points show up as red. An application would be visualisation of the long time behaviour of some system when data is imported from an external source.

For example if we take

ListLinePlot[Table[E^-0.001 x {Cos[x], Sin[x]}, {x, 0, 100, 0.1}]]


then the outer lines should be purple ending up as red as the plot spirals in.

EDIT: I am now convinced the best thing you can do if you import a large amount of time ordered data into MMA is to immediately convert that data into an interpolation function and then use ParametricPlot. Here is an example:

data = Table[{Sin[2 u], Cos[u]}, {u, 0, 100, 0.1}];
indexlist = Rescale[Range@Length@data] (*or your external list to control color*);
iF = Interpolation[MapThread[{#, #2} &, {indexlist, data}], InterpolationOrder -> 1];
ParametricPlot[iF[u], {u, 0, 1}, ColorFunction -> Function[{x, y, u}, ColorData["Rainbow"][u]]]


This answer is obviously based on @kglr's answer but the slight difference is he uses interpolation to return a color as a function of $${x,y}$$ position while here interpolation is used to return $${x,y}$$ as a function of time. In this way, if you have overlapping data as I do above, the later data is always plotted on the top.

data = Table[E^-0.001 x {Cos[x], Sin[x]}, {x, 0, 100, 0.1}];

indexlist = Rescale[Range @ Length @ data] (* or your external list to control color*);


### ListLinePlot

iF = Interpolation[MapThread[{#, #2} &, {data, indexlist}], InterpolationOrder -> 1];

ListLinePlot[data,
AspectRatio -> 1,
ColorFunctionScaling -> False,
ColorFunction -> (ColorData[{"Rainbow", "Reversed"}][ iF[#, #2]]&)] Alternative methods:

### PolarPlot

PolarPlot[E^-0.001 x , {x, 0, 100},
ColorFunction -> (ColorData[{"Rainbow", "Reversed"}][#3] &)


same picture

### ParametricPlot

ParametricPlot[E^-0.001 x {Cos[x], Sin[x]}, {x, 0, 100},
ColorFunction -> (ColorData[{"Rainbow", "Reversed"}][#3] &)]


same picture

### Graphics + VertexColors

Graphics[Line[data,  VertexColors -> (ColorData[{"Rainbow", "Reversed"}] /@ indexlist)],
Axes -> True]


same picture

• This is a good answer, but I think you want (ColorData[{"Rainbow", "Reverse"}] to satisfy the OP's coloring order. – m_goldberg Sep 13 at 14:14
• Thank you @m_goldberg. ColorData[{"Rainbow", "Reversed"}] and ColorData[{"Rainbow", "Reverse"}] both work. – kglr Sep 13 at 14:18
• You're right, they both work. Your solution is independent of the ordering of the Rainbow color scheme. Still, I feel a little stupid about making my original comment. – m_goldberg Sep 13 at 14:44
• I hesitated to mark this as the accepted answer, although it more than answers my initial question, since I was worried what happens if you have data that overlaps. suppose data = Table[{Sin[2 u], Cos[u]}, {u, 0, 100, 0.1}]; the older colors are plotted first and obscure the newer ones. The quick and dirty workaround is to simply Reverse data in ListLinePlot but I think if you are importing data the best thing to do is turn it into a parametric function and then plot based on time. Of course I explicitly asked for ListLinePlot but I think this method is better. – Takoda Sep 19 at 7:37

I think it is easier to generate the plot you want with ParametricPlot Like so:

With[{n = 100},
ParametricPlot[E^-0.001 x {Cos[x], Sin[x]}, {x, 0, n},
Mesh -> n - 1,
MeshStyle -> Transparent, With[{lines=Line/@Partition[Table[E^-0.001 x {Cos[x], Sin[x]}, {x, 0, 100, 0.1}],2,1]}, 