6
$\begingroup$

I would like to have a plot like the following:

enter image description here

However, with my code:

DensityPlot[x^2 + y^2, {x, -10, 10}, {y, -10, 10}, 
  MeshFunctions -> {#2^2 + #1^2 &}, 
  MeshShading -> {Hue[0.5], Automatic}, Mesh -> 15]

I can only get:

enter image description here

This is too ugly.
Can anyone help me with in mathematica? The original one is plotted by root.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But what's plotted in the first picture? $P_z$? What's the relationship between $P_z$ and $p_x$ and $p_y$? $\endgroup$
    – xzczd
    Sep 15, 2018 at 10:42

1 Answer 1

13
$\begingroup$

As you did not make it supper clear which aspect you wanted to change, I just share some intermediate steps as well. Combination of different tricks perhaps allows you to get the figure you need.

Masking using Mesh

The initial approach of OP.

DensityPlot[x y, {x, -π/4, π/4}, {y, -π/4, π/4}, 
 MeshFunctions -> {#2^2 + #1^2 &}, MeshShading -> {Automatic, White}, 
 Mesh -> 1, PlotLegends -> Automatic, 
 ColorFunction -> (Blend[{{-1, Red}, {0, White}, {1, Blue}}, 
     Tan[2 # - 1]] &)]

enter image description here

Plot domain using Region

This allows using Mesh for something else, and avoid evaluating the plotted function outside of the plotted domain.

DensityPlot[x y, {x, y} ∈ Disk[{0, 0}, 3], 
 MeshFunctions -> {Norm[{#1, #2, #3}] &}, Mesh -> 5, 
 PlotLegends -> Automatic, 
 ColorFunction -> (Blend[{{-1, Red}, {0, White}, {1, Blue}}, 
     Tan[2 # - 1]] &)]

enter image description here

RegionFunction & manual choice sampling points

Mathematica tries to find optimal points for sampling the plotted function in the sense, that the plot would be smooth with minimal amount of function evaluations. However, one might want to pick the sampling point coordinates manually. This might be a good choice if you know the region of interest beforehand.

To limit the plot range to the specific region, I now use RegionFunction.

To mimic the sampling given in your target figure, I use a Table. By default Mathematica tries to make the plot look continuous using Interpolation, but in many application one actually needs to see the data granularity, so I set it off explicitly by InterpolationOrder -> 0.

ListDensityPlot[
 Flatten[Table[{x = r Cos[θ], y = r Sin[θ], x y}, {r, 
    0.1, 10}, {θ, 0, 2 π, 0.2}], 1], Mesh -> None, 
 PlotLegends -> Automatic, InterpolationOrder -> 0,
 RegionFunction -> Function[{x, y, z}, x^2 + y^2 < 100], 
 ColorFunction -> (Blend[{{-1, Red}, {0, White}, {1, Blue}}, 
     Tan[2 # - 1]] &)]

enter image description here

Style for scientific plotting

I agree, that some style defaults Mathematica has are not so suitable for scientific setting. I will try to get the same feel, as the target figure by OP.

lWidth = AbsoluteThickness[0.2];
ListDensityPlot[
 Flatten[Block[{x, y}, 
   Table[{x = r Cos[θ], y = r Sin[θ], x y}, 
     {r, 0.1, 10}, 
     {θ, 0, 2 π, 0.2}]], 1], 
 PlotLegends -> 
  BarLegend[Automatic, FrameStyle -> Directive[Black, lWidth], 
   LegendMarkerSize -> 150, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, lWidth]], 
 InterpolationOrder -> 0, 
 BoundaryStyle -> Directive[Black, lWidth], 
 ImagePadding -> {{Automatic, Automatic}, {Automatic, 5}},
 RegionFunction -> Function[{x, y, z}, x^2 + y^2 < 100], 
 FrameStyle -> Directive[Black, lWidth], 
 ImageSize -> 200, 
 FrameLabel -> {Row[{Style[Subscript[p, x], "TR"], " [GeV]"}], 
   Row[{Style[Subscript[p, y], "TR"], " [GeV]"}]}, 
 ColorFunction -> (Blend[{{-1, Red}, {0, White}, {1, Blue}}, 
     Tan[2 # - 1]] &)
]~Magnify~1.5

enter image description here

There are better approaches for formatting scientific looking figures using custom Styles, PlotThemes and 3rd party packages.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.