11
$\begingroup$

My question is as follows. Suppose we have a function $f(r)$ and we want to study its asymptotic behavior at infinity ($r\rightarrow \infty$). For example, the function may reduce to $-\frac{a}{r}$ or $b e^{-cr}$ at infinity. How do I identify the constants $a,b$ and $c$ using Mathematica? Or, more generally, how do I identify the asymptote of a function? Can anybody point out useful built-in functions?

I am interested in the function:

$$ f(r)=-\frac{\sqrt[3]{3} e^{-2 r/3}}{\pi ^{2/3}}-\frac{\sqrt[3]{2 \pi } e^{2 r/3}}{5 \left(\frac{3 \sqrt[3]{\pi } e^{2 r/3} \sinh ^{-1}\left(2 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi } e^{2 r/3}\right)}{5\ 2^{2/3}}+1\right)} $$

or

f[r_]:=-((3^(1/3) E^(-2 r/3))/\[Pi]^(2/3)) - (E^(2 r/3) (2 \[Pi])^(1/3))/(
 5 (1 + (3 E^(2 r/3) \[Pi]^(1/3)
      ArcSinh[2 E^(2 r/3) (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)])/(5 2^(2/3))))

I expect this function to have -$\frac{1}{r}$-behavior. How do I check it? I am not interested in a numerical value of the limit (which is 0), but rather in a function the original function reduces to at infinity.

P.S. Using Mathematica for a week

$\endgroup$
6
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Google for Asymptotic analysis ... there is a whole world in your hands $\endgroup$ Jan 17, 2013 at 17:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The second part of this question is broad and perhaps--if suitably narrowed--would be more appropriate on the math site. Is there a specific function you would like to analyze? $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Jan 17, 2013 at 17:59
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Closely related question: How to expand a function into a power series with negative powers? $\endgroup$
    – Jens
    Jan 17, 2013 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ For what it's worth, the expansion I did (with ArcSinh or ArcSin) does show explicitly that the asymptotic behavior is O(1/r). $\endgroup$ Jan 18, 2013 at 14:37
  • $\begingroup$ I tried N[Normal[Series[f[r], {r, Infinity, 5}]]] /. r -> 100 and N[Normal[Series[f[r], {r, 0, 5}]]] /. r -> r^-1 /. r -> 100 (to get the expansion in negative powers, as suggested above). But two commands return different results. What am I doing wrong? $\endgroup$
    – molkee
    Jan 18, 2013 at 16:10

4 Answers 4

10
$\begingroup$
f[r_] := 3^(1/3)*Exp[-2*r/3]/Pi^(2/3) - (2*Pi)^(1/3)*
   Exp[2*r/3]/(5*(3*Pi^(1/3)*Exp[2*r/3]*
         ArcSin[2*(2*Pi)^(1/3)*Exp[2*r/3]]/(5*2^(2/3)) + 1))

In this case you might just observe that there is a commonly appearing expression Exp[2*r/3]. Substitute in a enw variable and expand a series at infinity in both variables. Then replace the substituted variable.

g[r_] := f[r] /. {Exp[-2*r/3] -> 1/y, Exp[2*r/3] -> y}

hh = PowerExpand[
  Normal[Series[g[r], {y, Infinity, 1}, {x, Infinity, 1}]] /. 
   y -> Exp[2*r/3]]

(* -(4/(3*(Pi - (4*I*r)/3 - I*(4*Log[2] + 
                   (2/3)*(Log[2] + Log[Pi]))))) + 
   (3^(1/3)/Pi^(2/3) + (40*2^(2/3))/(9*Pi^(1/3)*
             (Pi - (4*I*r)/3 - 
          I*(4*Log[2] + (2/3)*(Log[2] + Log[Pi])))^
               2))/E^((2*r)/3) *)

This should give a good idea of the behavior at infinity.

There are ways of making this algorithmic. I won't pursue that though.

This result captures the asymptotic behavior quite well, I will say. Here's a quick numeric check.

f[111.]

(* Out[252]= -0.000181229 - 0.00876831 I *)

hh /. r -> 111.

(* Out[263]= -0.000181229 - 0.00876831 I *)

By the way, it would be most helpful if in future you use actual Mathematica notation rather than provide only a LaTeX form that needs to be translated.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, providing a formula in $\TeX$ is a problem. In this case, for instance, "ArcSinh" inadvertently became "ArcSin" in your answer--that's why you're getting complex values for real values of the argument. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Jan 17, 2013 at 21:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @whuber I don't know if it was inadvertant...that 'h' might have been suicidal. $\endgroup$ Jan 17, 2013 at 21:30
  • $\begingroup$ yep, you should have ArcSinh in place of ArcSin. Added Mathematica code $\endgroup$
    – molkee
    Jan 17, 2013 at 22:45
6
$\begingroup$

You can use the Limit function:

f[r_] := -((3^(1/3) E^(-2 r/3))/\[Pi]^(2/3)) - (E^(2 r/3) (2 \[Pi])^(1/
         3))/(5 (1 + (3 E^(2 r/3) \[Pi]^(1/3) ArcSinh[
         2 E^(2 r/3) (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)])/(5 2^(2/3))))
Limit[f[r], r -> \[Infinity]]

...which returns 0. Plotting shows that this is correct:

Plot[f[r], {r, 1, 10000}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ But how do I show that the function behaves like $-\frac{1}{r}$ at infinity? $\endgroup$
    – molkee
    Jan 18, 2013 at 2:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @molkee You can show that the function behaves like -1/r at infinity via Limit[r*f[r], r->∞]. Note the factor of r multiplying f[r]. $\endgroup$
    – user9892
    Oct 8, 2013 at 2:14
4
$\begingroup$

Another possibility is to use new in M12 function AsymptoticSolve:

sol = AsymptoticSolve[y==f[r],y,{r,Infinity,4}]
{{y -> (-8 r^3 + 12 r^2 Log[4 (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)] - 
18 r Log[4 (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)]^2 + 27 Log[4 (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)]^3)/(8 r^4)}}

Compare to Vaclav's answer:

Series[y /. First @ sol, {r, Infinity, 4}] //TeXForm

$-\frac{1}{r}+\frac{3 \log \left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{2 r^2}-\frac{9 \log ^2\left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{4 r^3}+\frac{27 \log ^3\left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{8 r^4}+O\left(\left(\frac{1}{r}\right)^5\right)$

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Making use of {{y -> (-8 r^3 + 12 r^2 Log[4 (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)] - 18 r Log[4 (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)]^2 + 27 Log[4 (2 \[Pi])^(1/3)]^3)/(8 r^4)}} // Expand gives a nicer result $$\left\{\left\{y\to \frac{27 \log ^3\left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{8 r^4}-\frac{9 \log ^2\left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{4 r^3}+\frac{3 \log \left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{2 r^2}-\frac{1}{r}\right\}\right\} .$$ $\endgroup$
    – user64494
    Jul 8, 2021 at 4:25
1
$\begingroup$

When Series is not applicable, we can use a cycle of Limits

fun = f[r] (* for f[r] see above *); ser = 0; c = 0; Do[fun = (fun - c)*r; 
c = Limit[fun, r -> Infinity];
ser += c/r^k, {k, 1, 4}]; Print[ser]

We get an asymptotic expansion with more terms $$-\frac{1}{r} + \frac{\log (128 \pi )}{2 r^2} - \frac{9 \log ^2\left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{4 r^3} + \frac{27 \log ^3\left(4 \sqrt[3]{2 \pi }\right)}{8 r^4}$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.