# Problem when defining a function as a finite sum

I am using Mathematica 8.0.1.0. I defined the following function for use in an answer on math.SE:

f[j_] := Sum[1/(j-2k+1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}]

I then used this function in

NSum[(-1)^i f[i], {i, 0, 7}, WorkingPrecision -> 20]

I was expecting a positive answer, but got -0.83296130952380952381, whereas

N[f[0]-f[1]+f[2]-f[3]+f[4]-f[5]+f[6]-f[7], 20]

gives 0.83296130952380952381 which is the answer I expected.

If I define the function as

f[j_] := Evaluate[Sum[1/(j-2k+1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}]]

then f[0] yields 1/8 (4 ArcTanh[1/2] - 4 (2 + ArcTanh[1/2])) which simplifies to -1. This is very surprising since f[0] is a sum of positive values. In fact, Simplify[f[k]] gives the negative of what the answer should be, at least for the integers k that I have tried. This possibly narrows down where the problem lies when I use the original function in NSum

Is this a problem with version 8.0.1.0, or is this reproducible in more recent versions of Mathematica?

There is a second problem when I use the original function in

NSum[(-1)^k f[k], {k, 0, 7}, WorkingPrecision -> 20]

I get the errors

Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0 encountered. >>

and

NSum::nsnum: Summand (or its derivative) (-1)^k f[k] is not numerical at point k = 0. >>

I don't understand these errors. I thought the local variable names were treated as if used in Block, so I don't see why the k in the definition of the function should interfere.

• Looks like a bug in Sum (for f[j]). I get the negative sum in V11.2. Mar 3, 2018 at 20:21
• @MichaelE2: Thanks for the verification! I was getting a similar negative result for another sum yesterday, so I was worried my computer was possessed. Mar 3, 2018 at 20:37

It looks like the symbolic sum is computed wrong:

Clear[f];
f[j_] := Sum[1/(j - 2 k + 1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}];

f[j] /. j -> 0.  (* sum first with symbolic limit, then with 0. substituted *)
f[0.]            (* sum with numeric limit *)
(*
-1.
1.
*)


Fixes:

Restrict j to numeric values:

Clear[ff];
ff[j_Integer] := Sum[1/(j - 2 k + 1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}];
NSum[(-1)^i ff[i], {i, 0, 7}, WorkingPrecision -> 20]
(*  0.83296130952380952381  *)


The same thing, with k protected by Module[{k},...]:

Clear[ff];
ff[j_Integer] := Module[{k}, Sum[1/(j - 2 k + 1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}]];
NSum[(-1)^k fff[k], {k, 0, 7}, WorkingPrecision -> 20]
(*  0.83296130952380952381  *)


Avoid Sum (which I usually do when I want to calculate the sum of a finite number of terms):

Clear[fff];
fff[j_Integer] := Total@Table[1/(j - 2 k + 1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}]
NSum[(-1)^i fff[i], {i, 0, 7}, WorkingPrecision -> 20]
(*  0.83296130952380952381  *)

• Thanks! This confirms my suspicions that there was something wrong in the symbolic sum since the symbolic result for f[0] simplified pretty easily to -1. Mar 3, 2018 at 21:12

Well, you can read in the documentation that "NSum first localizes the values of all variables, then evaluates f with the variables being symbolic, and then repeatedly evaluates the result numerically".

I suggest you use Trace to see how different is NSum[] related to N[Sum[]]. I would simply do:

f[j_] := Sum[1/(j - 2 k + 1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}];
N[Sum[(-1)^(i) f[i], {i, 0, 7}], 20]

(* 0.83296130952380952380952380952380952381 *)

• Thanks! This tells why the k might interfere. I will use Trace to investigate further. However, that f[j_] := Sum[1/(j - 2 k + 1)/4^k, {k, 0, Floor[j/2]}]; NSum[(-1)^(i) f[i], {i, 0, 7}, WorkingPrecision -> 20] returns the negative of the correct answer still does not make sense. Mar 3, 2018 at 19:51
• I think it can help if you define f[j_]=Sum[...] and run f[0], you might understand what is happening. Mar 3, 2018 at 19:54
• Yes, that's the same result for f[0] that I mention in my question: 1/8 (4 ArcTanh[1/2] - 4 (2 + ArcTanh[1/2])) which simplifies easily to -1. Mar 3, 2018 at 20:40