11
$\begingroup$

Simple question but problem with NSolve.

I need help how to extract first positive root?
For example:

 eq = -70.5 + 450.33 x^2 - 25 x^4;
 NSolve[ eq == 0, x]

If I have an equation eq that I am not sure of polynomial order and I need to define all positive roots x[1], ..., x[2].

$\endgroup$
0

3 Answers 3

18
$\begingroup$

The most straightforward way would be FindRoot[ eq, {x, 0}] but since this specific polynomial eq has a singular Jacobian at x == 0 (evaluate e.g. Reduce[ D[ eq, x] == 0, x]) one would rather use FindRoot[ eq, {x, x0}] for small x0 > 0. The argument x0 depends on a case by case basis, but for the problem at hand an appropriate value might be 0 < x0 <= 2.4, e.g. :

FindRoot[ eq, {x, 0.5}]
{x -> 0.397412}

More general considerations must include huge order polynomials, which might have many real roots. So finding every root may be very inefficient. In such cases there is a handy function RootInterval which can be much more efficient than any NSolve approach and especially handy when using it together with FindRoot.

First @ RootIntervals[eq]
{{-(273/64), -(263/64)}, {-(33/64), -(23/64)}, {47/128, 57/128}, {263/64, 273/64}}

It shows where one can find the first positive root , i.e. in this interval : {47/128, 57/128}. To choose only intervals where positive roots may be found we use e.g. :

intervals = First @ RootIntervals[eq] ~ DeleteCases ~ {_, _?Negative}
{{47/128, 57/128}, {263/64, 273/64}}

Then we use it for finding roots numerically with Brent's method -- the most powerful algorithm available for FindRoot :

roots = FindRoot[ eq, {x, #[[1]], #[[2]]}, Method -> "Brent"][[All, 2]]& /@ intervals //
        Flatten
{0.397412, 4.22555}

The last step is standard :

Min @ roots
0.397412

The first root might be negative therefore we could use e.g. :

RankedMin[roots, #]& /@ {1, 2}

Now for the sake of completeness we demonstrate small intervals and roots on the plot of the polynomial over the positive reals :

Plot[ eq, {x, -4.5, 4.5}, PlotStyle -> Thick, AspectRatio -> 1/3, Epilog -> {
          Darker @ Red, Thickness[0.005], Line[{{#1, 0}, {#2, 0}}]& @@@ intervals,
          Green, PointSize[0.007], Point[{#, 0}] & /@ roots } ]

enter image description here

the same plot in pieces :

GraphicsRow[ 
    Plot[   eq, {x, #1 - 0.3, #2 + 0.3}, PlotStyle -> Thickness[0.01], Epilog -> {
                 Red, Thickness[0.011], Line[{{#1, 0}, {#2, 0}}] & @@@ intervals, 
                 Green, PointSize[0.015], Point[{#, 0}] & /@ roots}] & @@@ intervals ]

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Congrats! Fully answer. $\endgroup$
    – Pipe
    Dec 19, 2012 at 15:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Artes: How can you generalize your Code given above to a system of nonlinear equations? I am struggling to find real solutions to the NL system. Can you give me an example, for example, for a system of 5 nonlinear (NL) equations? and find the equilibrium limited to only real values. $\endgroup$ Apr 19, 2019 at 10:25
  • $\begingroup$ @TugrulTemel eq==0 is a nonlinear equation, to solve a system you should use something like FindRoot[{eq1==0,...,eq5==0},{{x1,y0},...,{x5,y5}}] possibly with an appropriate method. For a specific problem you should better ask another question. Sometimes you can get solutions with Solve or NSolve with domain specification, eg. NSolve[{eq1==0,...eq5==0},{x1,...,x5},Reals]. $\endgroup$
    – Artes
    Apr 19, 2019 at 15:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Artes: Thank you very much. I cannot figure out why NSolve is very slow for a system of 30 equations (mixed: linear and nonlinear). Regards. $\endgroup$ Apr 19, 2019 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ @TugrulTemel It is not surprising, that solving systems of 30 equations is very slow. In such a case more reasonable is to exploit FindRoot. $\endgroup$
    – Artes
    Apr 19, 2019 at 19:23
14
$\begingroup$
    eq = -70.5 + 450.33 x^2 - 25 x^4;
    roots = x /. NSolve[eq == 0, x]
    Min@Select[roots, Positive]
0.397412
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ yes, but how to extract second, third ... separately? $\endgroup$
    – Pipe
    Dec 18, 2012 at 21:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Pipe you can use Sort instead of Min to get the ordered positive roots $\endgroup$
    – ssch
    Dec 18, 2012 at 21:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Nasser it is working but how to extract just second for example $\endgroup$
    – Pipe
    Dec 18, 2012 at 21:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Nasser Thank you very much, it is clear now $\endgroup$
    – Pipe
    Dec 18, 2012 at 23:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Pipe: Had you asked for how to extract the 2nd or 3rd, etc., I would have indeed have used Sort instead of Min. But you asked just for the 1st! $\endgroup$
    – murray
    Dec 20, 2012 at 15:54
5
$\begingroup$

Well, if you wanted to give NSolve your conditions directly, you can do

NSolve[-70.5 + 450.33 x^2 - 25 x^4 == 0 && x > 0, x]

And then if you want, you can pick the Min solution.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.