0
$\begingroup$

I have these functions:

f[dA_,dB_] :=(3.2 (0.389 +dA (-2 (0.175 + 0.012 dB) + 0.078 (-1 + dB) +0.012 (-1 + dB)^2) + dA^2 (0.214 - 0.027 dB) - 0.039 (-1 + dA) (-1 + dB)^2 + (-0.027 + 0.175 (-2 + dB)) dB) + (-1 + dA) (-1 + dB) (2.04 (-1 + dA) (-1 + dB) + (-1 + dA dB) Vin))/((-1 + dA) (-1 + dB) (-1 + dA dB) Vin)
g[dA_,dB_] :=-3.2 (0.214/(1 - dA) + (0.187 dA)/(1 - dA)^2) + ((1 - (1.02 (1 - dA))/Vin) Vin)/(1 - dA)
h[dA_,dB_] :=-3.2 (0.214/(1 - dB) + (0.187 dB)/(1 - dB)^2) + (dB (1 - (1.02 (1 - dB))/(dB Vin)) Vin)/(1 - dB)

I would like to find the maximum of f, with parameter Vin. Also, the following constraints must be met: 

0<dA<1 && 0<dB<1 && 0<Vin<=625 && g+h=625

I have been trying to use the function FindMaximum, but I think I do something wrong and I don't have any solution. 

FindMaximum[{f, 0 < dA < 1 && 0 < dB < 1 && 0 < Vin <= 625 && g + h=625},{dA, dB}]

Could somebody help me understand what is my mistake or suggest another way to solve my problem? I have been also trying to use Partial Differential Equations, but I didn't have results also there.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

You need to give numeric values to Vin.

This:

max = Table[{dA, dB} /. 
   FindMaximum[{f[dA, dB], 
      0 < dA < 1 && 0 < dB < 1 && g[dA, dB] + h[dA, dB] == 625},
        {{dA, 1/2}, {dB, 1/2}}, Method -> "InteriorPoint"][[2]], {Vin, 1, 625}]

or better this:

max = Table[
   FindArgMax[{f[dA, dB], 
     0 < dA < 1 && 0 < dB < 1 && g[dA, dB] + h[dA, dB] == 625},
      {{dA, 1/2}, {dB, 1/2}}, Method -> "InteriorPoint"], {Vin, 1, 625}];

shows that the maximum is along the line dA = dB for all Vin:

ListPlot[max, Frame -> True, PlotStyle -> Black, AspectRatio -> 1, 
 PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {0, 1}}, FrameLabel -> {"dA", "dB"}]

enter image description here

To verify:

Manipulate[
 Plot3D[f[dA, dB] /. Vin -> v0, {dA, 0, 1}, {dB, 0, 1}],
  {{v0, 100}, 1, 625, Appearance -> {"Open"}}]

enter image description here

c = max[[100]]

{0.731275, 0.731275}

f @@ c /. Vin -> 100

0.970111

(g @@ c + h @@ c) /. Vin -> 100

625.

f[0.5, 0.5] /. Vin -> 100

0.976091

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for the analytical and quick answer. Indeed, I am expecting dA=dB for all Vin. However, is there a way to have the analytical solution, e.g. dA=function(Vin), dB=function(Vin)? $\endgroup$ – harazogo Jan 14 '18 at 12:10
  • $\begingroup$ Maximize doesn't work for me. Maybe you could use an implementation of the Lagrange multipliers. $\endgroup$ – corey979 Jan 14 '18 at 12:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.