11
$\begingroup$

H$\vphantom{a}$i. Consider the following code:

f1 = Plot3D[-Exp[-x^2-y^2],{x,-5,5},{y,-5,5},PlotRange->All]
f2 = Graphics3D[Table[{Arrowheads[.01],Arrow[{{2Cos[i],2Sin[i],0},{2.5Cos[i], 2.5Sin[i],0}}]},{i,0,2Pi,2Pi/40}]]

enter image description hereenter image description here

So far so good. Let us now combine these figures into a single figure:

Show[f1, f2]

enter image description here

For some reason, some arrows look funny: their heads are much larger than they should be. The behaviour is even weirder if we rotate the figure

enter image description here

What's going on here? how can I fix this?

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

The problem can be identified if you just do

Show[f2, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 2}]

arrowheads

I talked about this issue in this answer, and my suggestion would be to use the same solution here. I'd suggest just using the function arrowLine I defined in that answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yep, this works perfectly. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Jun 4 '17 at 16:55
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform I looked at my suggestion of BoxRatios->Automatic in the linked answer and find that it doesn't work properly here. So I'd say just use the arrowLine function. That Arrowheads stuff is just badly designed. $\endgroup$ – Jens Jun 4 '17 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure why you say it doesn't work properly here. I changed Exp[-x^2-y^2] to 3Exp[-x^2-y^2], and the result looks fine to me. $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Jun 4 '17 at 17:01
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform if you look closely the heads are still off, at least in my plots... so I'd really say ditch the built-in arrows. $\endgroup$ – Jens Jun 4 '17 at 17:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.