My mathematica is doing weird things. Consider the function


Let's make a list out of this


when evaluated I get that the list points has these four entries


(* {{60., 0.0539289}, {61., 0.0534851}, {62., 0.00402142}, {63.,0.00395776}} *)

That is, the first two are above 0.05 and the last two are significantly smaller. Nonetheless, when I perform a ListPlot of points I get a plot where the four dots are way above 0.05. What is going on? Is this a bug?

ListPlot[points, PlotRange -> {0, 0.06}, PlotStyle -> Red]

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ Your Table is missing an iterator (n) and Gamma[-60,-60] doesn't evaluate for me. Did you transcribe your code correctly? $\endgroup$
    – Chris K
    Commented Apr 20, 2017 at 13:52
  • $\begingroup$ edited and Gamma[-60,-60] evaluates without any problems to me $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 20, 2017 at 14:04
  • $\begingroup$ In order to see the decimal output you show, you had to use N, otherwise you would see something with very large integers multiplied by Gama[-60,-60], so I added that line to the post. So if you use ListPlot[N@points] then you see what you expect $\endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Commented Apr 20, 2017 at 14:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JasonB. ok. But why does not my code work? It should work shouldnt it? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 20, 2017 at 14:06
  • $\begingroup$ @AnarchistBirdsWorshipFungus - you are multiplying very huge numbers (10^83) by very small numbers (10^-82), so you have to give some consideration to precision. I think that ListPlot is being smarter than N in this case, check the output from this: Block[{$MaxExtraPrecision = 100}, N[points, {∞, 5}] ] $\endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Commented Apr 20, 2017 at 14:09

1 Answer 1


N @ points is using machine arithmetic and giving you bad values at 62 and 63. Changing over to Mathematica's arbitrary precision arithmetic, even at the fairly low precision of 20 digits,

N[points, 20]


{{60.000000000000000000, 0.053928873945168632029}, 
 {61.000000000000000000, 0.053485094513170474678}, 
 {62.000000000000000000, 0.053052093270633190146}, 
 {63.000000000000000000, 0.052629440880266559186}}

showing that your list plot is correct.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.