3
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

Suppose I am developing a package (because I am :)). Mathematica gives me the option of creating a Wolfram Language (.wl) package or a Mathematica (.m) package. Why would I choose one vs the other? There seem to be a couple of questions on the (seemingly nonexistent) differences between Mathematica and WL, but they don't quite address the above.

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by gwr, Community Apr 15 '17 at 18:21

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 6
    $\begingroup$ .wl has the great advantage of not conflicting with MATLAB's m files $\endgroup$ – Gustavo Delfino Apr 15 '17 at 1:29
  • $\begingroup$ @GustavoDelfino And also ObjectiveC files on the Mac (which is why I am tempted to use .wl) but I am worried that there is some weird semantic difference I am missing. $\endgroup$ – Igor Rivin Apr 15 '17 at 1:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This might be a dupe. $\endgroup$ – J. M. will be back soon Apr 15 '17 at 1:53
  • $\begingroup$ @J.M. Yup, it looks very similar. $\endgroup$ – Igor Rivin Apr 15 '17 at 2:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am using the Workbench-plugin for Eclipse for writing packages, which is the only version of Workbench left, that is being supported. In Workbench whenever I start a new package, everything is automatically named with .m suffix. TL;DR whatever branding move there is - it appears to not really have gotten down to tutorials, guides and tools very much, has it? $\endgroup$ – gwr Apr 15 '17 at 16:39

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.